Bridget to Birth Brady Baby on Bundchen's Birthday
Before there was the drama involving baseball star Alex Rodriguez, his wife, Cynthia Rodriguez, and his mistress, Joslyn Noel Morse, there was another scandalous love triangle involving a hunky, famous athlete making headlines.
One with better looking women.
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady knocked up girlfriend Bridget Moynahan (some staff members of this celebrity news publication firmly believe Bridget "pulled the goalie" on Tom unexpectedly), and to make matters worse, the Six Degrees star announced she was with child after he broke up with her and took up with someone else.
Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen.
While Tom and Gisele - who was also rumored, inaccurately, to be preggers a few months back - have put up a happy front for the cameras throughout the ordeal - the New York Post's Page Six reports today that Gisele is pissed about the baby's impending birth.
Bridget Moynahan is due to give birth to their first child, a son, this Friday... which happens to be Bundchen's birthday. Man, talk about payback! Or an amazing coincidence.
The tension has grown so intense that Tom Brady was seen fighting openly with Bundchen in front of hotel guests in Napa while staying at the five-star Auberge du Soleil.
However, all hasn't been bad lately, as Tom's family is said to be flying out to Italy to spend time at the villa in Rome that Gisele recently acquired.
At the same time, it's hard to imagine her taking kindly to his parental duties once the child is born. Could this be the beginning of the end for the Brady Bundchen?
We'll have to wait and see. And hope he and Bridget take shared custody lessons from the beacons of paternal aptitude, Britney Spears and Kevin Federline.
July 17th, 2007 2:48 PM
I would prefer to be raised by feral dogs than the likes of the Umlaut. Less likely to contract rabies from them.
http://dreamboatbaby.blogspot.com
August 27th, 2007 10:44 PM
Making a baby doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Winning a Superbowl doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Shelling out thousands of dollars to pay for a nanny doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Jetsetting across the world does not make Tom Brady a man.
Getting up in the middle of the night to support the mother of his child as she breast feeds, makes him a man. Getting up in the middle of the night to change his son's diaper or simply to comfort his son when he is crying, makes him a man. Providing emotional and physical support to the mother of his child makes him a man...
Only time will tell if Tom Brady will be a man.
November 4th, 2007 3:36 PM
Who knows wha6t transpired at the end of Tom and Bridget's relationship but it really looks like it was a last ditch effort by Bridget to hold on to him. It is unlikely that Bridget would have had time to go off the pill in time to make it a coincident. Regardless their is a baby.........a beautiful, innocent child involved now. They are both old enough to know what needs to happen. Ms. Bundchen's feelings are her's to have but should not be involved in what is best for this child..........the three of them are not teenagers any more. If Bridget tricked him into this pregnancy then she knows it and should not use the child as a weapon on any level. It Brady dumped her because she got pregnant then he needs to have a "come to Jesus meeting" with himself and possible her fasther and his father and do what is best for his son. This does not necessarily include marriage, but he should put a gagf on the model, do his best to make it right with the mother of his child and BE that boy's father on all levels, period.
I don't understand what the deal is about the mother not seeing her son after he was born, but it only ends up hurting and losing one of the most precious and loving moments that Bridget will ever have in her life. Bottom line is it is not for public public fodder and may all involved parties may have the grace of God with them and the bay.
November 18th, 2007 9:33 PM
Mr. Brady , you bring shame on your name, your family and your opportunity to be a role model for our youth..I doubt you were brought up and taught to have sex outside of marriage,but accept the concept or not, it is a rule of God and I beleive you know or should know that you broke His law and certainly the respect of this fan>
November 18th, 2007 10:08 PM
"Making a baby doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Winning a Superbowl doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Shelling out thousands of dollars to pay for a nanny doesn't make Tom Brady a man. Jetsetting across the world does not make Tom Brady a man.
Getting up in the middle of the night to support the mother of his child as she breast feeds, makes him a man. Getting up in the middle of the night to change his son's diaper or simply to comfort his son when he is crying, makes him a man. Providing emotional and physical support to the mother of his child makes him a man…
Only time will tell if Tom Brady will be a man."
one word: AMAZING! That was a great comment. I completely agree with what you are saying. I think it is a shame that people remain to call themselves fans of Brady. I think it's fine to be a fan of the Patriots, but not of Brady. He is a terrible BOY, never a man, who left his girlfriend during the pregnancy of THEIR child. He is an immature boy if you ask me.
November 18th, 2007 11:43 PM
If bridget is making it hard for John to see his dad there is no excuse for that.
Moving 3000 miles away from where she lived makes Bridget a bitch.
November 20th, 2007 10:49 PM
When will people wake up? I keep hearing about what a great, regular guy Tom Brady is. He's just another entertainer - like models and moviestars - another physically blessed guy who is drunk with the attention and swooning praise that the American public continues to pour on him (and all of the others). As described here, we're now seeing his true colors. Jump from one pretty face to another with little respect for the resonsibilities of fatherhood. But really, who cares? And why? Maybe it is Bridget (whoever she is) that set this up. Who cares? Shame on the public for making this our reality. Without the billions of dollars showered on the entertainment industry every year, without the constant fawning and scruitiny of the lives of these people, this isn't even news. If people would pay more attention to their own lives, families, personal problems, and perhaps even think about the millions of unfortunate people who can't even think to afford the price of a ticket to a professional sporting event, the perversely wasteful members of the entertainment industry could just go about the business of ruining their lives in privacy. You really want to make a statement? Stop paying to see professional sports, or watch costly movies, or listen to ridiculous hate-mongering music. Read a book or take a walk or play a game of tennis yourself! Get a life!
November 21st, 2007 5:39 AM
If bridget is making it hard for John to see his dad there is no excuse for that.
Moving 3000 miles away from where she lived makes Bridget a bitch.
Really?
Why did Tom Brady not move to CA to play for some football team in CA?
Acting takes place in Hollywood. Many actors and actresses live in Hollywood. Acutally most people in the acting business live in or close to Hollywood.
So Bridget is an actress. So she decided to live there after her NY-based series Six Degrees was axed.
Is anyone seriously astonished that Bridget moved to LA?
Is anyone seriously astonished that Bridget DID NOT move to Boston? Most of the most resistend Brady-worshippers live in Boston so why would the so called fame-whore Bridget move to Boston to get her daily dose of hatred by Brady-worshippers and Brady-worshipping media. There was a famous article on either Boston Herald or Globe which seriously discussed wheather Bridget really needed to "flaunt her baby belly" because Bridget had dared to make ONE SINGLE APPEARANCE at Martha Stewards. Obviously the Boston media seriously expected Bridget to hide till the end of her pregnancy in order not to "ashame Tom Brady".
What pregnant single dumped mother would want to live anywhere near Boston?
November 30th, 2007 5:14 PM
#
I was so pi**ed that I could not post this comment on Boston Herald for this shi**y article by Margaret Eagan:
http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1047741&format=comments&cnum=4
Bridget Moynahan committed the crime of "flaunting her baby belly despite being a single mom and therefore setting a bad example". Of course Tom Brady's rudeness to very publicly kiss and flaunt his supermodel squeeze despite his dumped pregnant ex has not even been mentioned by Ms/Mrs Eagan. What about showing a little bit of respect towards your dumped pregnant ex and what about NOT starting rumours about "bad bad Bridget wanting to trap Tom Brady"???? **********************
I don't like Eagan's attitude. Sure having a baby to be cool is not cool. But whose fault is it when teenagers want babies to be cool? I would suggest Mrs Eagan takes a look at Sex Education at high schools and at the recent president's ideas about premarital sex, conception and Sex Ed.
Or: if you don't tell teenagers on a biological and legal and social and pedagogic level what it means to have a baby / to have sex / to have a relationship then these teenagers will screw it. Is that so hard to understand? That you need to know what you are doing in order not to screw it up? ****************** Why don't we teach each male and each female teenager that having a relationship and having sex and having a baby needs consideration and respect and responsibility. Tell each man who acts like a horny bull that sex is nice for sure but that the result of a passionate encounter may be a pregnancy and that the legal responsibility of a pregnancy means 25 years of monthly child support. So it is one moment of passion vs. 300 paychecks. And do tell the girls that babies aren't cute lovely little moving dolls with sound effects but helpless human beings growing more independent who need at least some 300 month of attention and help. Tell boys and girls that having a baby would mean that their "fun teenager time" and their relatively "free" young adulthood is finally over.
********************************* Now back to Ms/Mrs Eagan. So according to her Bridget Moynahan and Melanie Brown make bad role models although both Moynahan and Brown both are perfectly capable of caring and providing for their babies? Don't you see the flaw in that kind of logic? Caring and responsible mothers are turned into "bad role models" because they are not married. So these two celeb mothers are "bad role models for motherhood" despite being good mothers!!! Now tell me whose reasoning is unreasonable.
But Eagan takes it even two steps further. 1. Moynahan and Brown set bad examples for being single moms because they are not married. And this "unmarried motherhood" is supposed to make teenagers think that being pregnant is cool. Both Moynahan and Brown have been dumped by the baby-daddies and both have received some media-bashing. But nevertheless teenagers will think that being a single parent helps you getting attention. Why do teenagers not draw the correct conclusion which is that a single mom will be bashed whereas a baby daddy who does not take responsibility will be pardonned and supported in bashing his pregnant dumped ex-girlfriend. Are teenagers that dumb that they don't see what is going on? And I think that teenagers who are so starved of attention would do many things to get attention: bulimia, anorexia, cutting, taking drugs, violence…. Teenagers try to find their place in their society. They learn to become adults. Wheather Moynahan or Brown are single moms or not would matter in all the teenagers' struggles to cope with the adult world.
2. And here is Eagan's second misleading conclusion: Moynahan and Brown are "bad role models" because they have become pregnant while being unmarried. - Not so true. At the time being both Moynahan and Brown were having relationships. Pre-marital relationships nowadays are some kind of "marriage on probation". People in relationships try to find out wheather this could be a long-term partner. In other words: Moynahan and Brown are NO SLUTS. Both were in a "marriage on probation" which resulted in a pregnancy. Now they are bashed for being "bad role models" because they have been dumped by their "partners-on-probation" who reject any responsibility for the babies they fathered. They just pay because they know they have to. We all know the baby grows in the woman's belly and not in the man's belly. Which is why some men say that they did not want the baby and that they don't want anything to do with the baby they fathered. These men get away with that. These men get away with having fun and not taking responsibility. These men do not get bashed for acting irresponsible. They have had sex and deny the resulting responsibilitiey. I wish I could do that in my next car accident. "No I did not want it. No I do not want anything to do with it." While I won't get away with this neither legally nor in public's view both Moynahan's and Brown's baby daddies get away in public's view with their pubertal behaviour. And those people who can't escape the pregnancy aspect so easily because the baby grows in their belly, they get media-bashed. Single moms get bashed. Single dads receive help bashing their pregnant dumped ex-girlfriend.
I guess it is neither Bridget Moynahan's movies nor Melanie Brown's skills that ensure a large circulation of the Boston Herald and therefore the salary of Ms/Mrs Eagan but the Patriots and Eddy Murphy and Hollywood do.
July 27th, 2008 8:31 AM
hi gisele please let me bean actress