Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell: Not Engaged!
First, Tom Brady and Giselle Bundchen.
Now, Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell.
Celebrity gossip tabloids simply cannot get their engagement stories correct, as Great Britain's The Mirror reported this week that McCartney and Shevell were set to tie the knot.
“Nancy and Sir Paul are totally natural together and feel blessed to have found happiness,” a source told the newspaper, adding that gold digging was not a concern with Shevell, as it was with McCartney's repulsive ex-wife, Heather Mills:
“Unlike Heather, [Nancy Shevell] is a multimillionaire in her own right and therefore could never be portrayed as being interested in Sir Paul for his money. She is calm, measured, and mature, whereas Heather is fiery and impulsive."
And the anti-Christ, according to other reputable insiders.
McCartney's publicist, Paul Freundlich, has shot down any engagement rumors, however, stating: "[There's] no truth to [them.]"
Related Posts
- Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell: Married!
- Paul McCartney, Nancy Shevell to Wed Next Month?
- Paul McCartney Hollas: Don't Need No Pre-Nup!
- Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell: Engaged!
Rank: New User
May 6th, 2011 6:43 PM
Well, the covers of protection vanished completely forsaking this swept off her feet lady to fiend for herself from Mr. Viciousness himself.
...feet?
September 25th, 2010 6:05 PM
If ANYONE is planning to marry Paul McCartney shut your ears. He's a liar and your reputation as he makes it now will differ
when he is displeased. Heather Mills got such a bum deal: I remember when he was so smitten that the no-prenup was great,
and she was wonderful, he was Mr. Romantic and butter couldn't melt. Baby was wonderful and never breathed a word about anything bad about Mills (God knows there was bad about him), he was her protector. Well, the covers of protection vanished completely forsaking this swept off her feet lady to fiend for herself from Mr. Viciousness himself. Look back at history.
You know someone AFTER the divorce. His first wife, Linda had
a hard enough time with him just happened to die first. He's
not Sire Mr. Wonderful.
February 10th, 2009 7:41 PM
If boasters turn into liars...
Look at Maccareport, his American side, you find under
December 30, 2008 -- This Is Nottingham
Interview: Sir Paul McCartney
...If dashing around this close to Christmas is good enough for a knighted Beatle, it's certainly good enough for the rest of us... Paul McCartney had got the Sir-title, MBE. This is the 5th degree, the lowest of the Order of the British Empire and means "member". Only the first and second degree included the knighthood (as B. Gates had got). Paul McCartney lies high as well as Nancy Shevell.
February 3rd, 2009 3:54 PM
Not behind his money? What´s the difference? Paul McCartney gave the disabled hooker and porn model two houses before he married her; so she looked wealthy for the press (and had a "firm"). The weak, totally stressed, flat-figured Nancy Shevell-Blakeman had with her trophy husband, a 52 old lawyer, one house; and a holiday house near Paul`s house. Currently the adulteress lives in a small flat and is since dec2008 divorced. She, 49, were a "multimillionaire heiress", in the UK press was 135, 150,250,350,450m. Take 135 and part it in 4, you get 33millions. If her parents have a house and a low middle class firm´s sales, you have the "multimillionaire in her own rights". A cheap person, usually ugly dressed, with the behaviour of a bitch(looking for the bills, sitting in the office from time to time and phoning and running behind to be fu++ed and wants to be married to Paul´s credit cards). Besides, someone, who has money wouldn´t tell it around. The firm of my girlfriend´father mak