It’s been far too long since we heard about Judith Regan, isn’t it? The fired publishing giant has been uncharacteristically silent since her departure, with Regan’s trademark ethnic slurs being channeled into a lawsuit against her former bosses at the company that’s resorted to changing its name to disassociate themselves from her entirely.
And while Regan certainly didn’t leave on the friendliest of terms, (reportedly an armed guard escorted her out after HC set her up to take the fall for greenlighting the O.J. tell-all controversy), we’re frankly sort of surprised that she didn’t get her boxed up office crap yet.
But that’s the latest, according to those in-the-know gossips over at the Daily News:
Rupert Murdoch’s minions at HarperCollins have been going through Judith Regan’s personal effects and still haven’t returned them five weeks after the publisher was fired amid the controversy over her plans to publish O.J. Simpson’s book “If I Did It.”
Legal staffers at the publishing house, which Regan is suing, have had access to everything from documents to her children’s report cards, a source tells us.
“They have her financial statements, her will, her divorce papers, photographs of her children, unopened Christmas gifts, even her clothing,” said the source.
Because really, come on guys. It’s no secret that you hate Regan, but do you really need to withhold her divorce papers, her will and pictures of the kids she never sees? And seriously, how many times do you really have to rifle through her designer Prada handbags before you’re entirely convinced that she didn’t slip a stapler (or other office supplies) into one of them?
We gotta say, when it comes to the issues of Jew-bashing or rewarding a murderer for brutally slaying his wife, we’re unilaterally against Judith Regan. But with respect to the unopened Christmas gifts, hilarious collection of office-related New Yorker cartoons and dirty laundry? We say, just give the witch her her cloak and broomstick back already.
No. 1
Antony says:
yea picks of her children that she hasent seen. thats not to nice. i would know i have never seen judith or jenna and there some what part family…….more gossip
Posted: Jan 28, 2007 at 1:01 am