Might Jeffrey Epstein’s publicist Howard Rubenstein colluded with also-client The New York Post to plant scurrilous items about Epstein accuser Maximila Cordero? MAYBE!
In one of the most sweeping accusations, the suit claims that the Post used the publicist it shares with Epstein, Howard Rubenstein, “to paint an outrageous, false, and defamatory portrait of the victim plaintiff and her attorney as ‘money-seeking lawyers and their women’. The Post did not advise their readers that Rubenstein worked for the paper and gave the impression that Rubenstein was only employed by Epstein. Defendants intentionally quoted phony websites from their own subsidiary company MySpace, wrongfully attributed sexually perverted quotes to plaintiff, distorted plaintiff’s background, went to plaintiff’s father, brother, and other relatives and wrongfully told them the plaintiff suffered from a sexually transmitted disease … failed to issue a retraction when the undisputed falsity of their story was presented to them, violated New York State medical privacy laws and rape shield laws to try and obtain confidential medical and other records about plaintiff, violated Journalism ethics standards for the treatment of sexual assault victims, and engaged in an outrageous pattern of malicious, false, defamatory, and reckless conduct which violated the standards of journalistic integrity…”
But, says Radar:
Conspicuously absent from the accusations is the Post’s revelation that Cordero was born a man. A source tells Radar that the initial filing of the suit by Unroch includes as an exhibit a birth certificate, which showed Cordero being born Maximilia Cordero, a woman. Reached by phone this weekend, Unroch (with Cordero commenting loudly in the background but declining to come to the phone), called the Post’s behavior “outrageous” but refused to address Cordero’s birth gender or the authenticity of the birth certificate originally filed. “She’s a woman,” Unroch tells Radar.
Just check them claws.
There are no comments yet. Post yours!