Report: Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston at War; Playing Mind Games!
No, this isn't Turn Back the Clock week at The Hollywood Gossip. This is the real deal (according to Star): Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie are at war.
The stakes: Probably non-existent.
The tactics: High-level mind games.
We are talking about dirty tricks, catty insults, 2 a.m. phone calls and the like. The kinds of things 12-year-olds do when they declare war on each other!
It's been almost five years since Brad Pitt split from Jennifer Aniston and took up with Mr. & Mrs. Smith costar Angelina Jolie, but Star Magazine two women involved in Hollywood's most famous love triangle cannot let their bitter rivalry go.
Tabloids have reported that Brad is running back to Jen - and whether that's true or not, it's clearly feeding the mutual dislike between the women of Brad.
The longtime feud has been refueled, in part, by both of the jealous, desperate women playing mind games with one another and refusing to back down.
Jen takes digs at Angie by flaunting her relationship with Brad's family while Angie relishes rubbing Jen's nose in the fact that she has six kids with Brad.
She might be having another without him, but no matter. The bottom line: "Jen and Angie despise each other and making each other squirm." Mmmkay.
Among the tricks Angelina Jolie employs? Finding out from designers what dress Jen wants to wear on the red carpet - then going for it herself. Burn!
Meanwhile, Jennifer Aniston makes late night calls to Brad when he’s in France, conveniently “forgetting” the time difference so she will wake Angelina.
As for Brad? He's "a terrible instigator" and even "eggs it on," according to reports. Hmm. Kind of like a rich man's movie star version of Brody Jenner.
Related Posts
- Tabloid Makes Angelina Jolie Pregnant With Twins! Both Boys! Yay!
- Angelina Jolie: En Route to Rehab After Heroin Relapse (Tabloid Nonsensically Claims)!
- Angelina Jolie Downplays Brad Pitt Marriage Talk
- SAG Awards Fashion Face-Off: Brangelina vs. Klooney
January 21st, 2010 12:03 AM
Someone needs to promote a movie or stay in the public eye b/c their career is non-existent. This is PR drivel to keep Aniston relevant when in actuality this is a non-story, old news and... no one really cares.
January 10th, 2010 11:57 PM
I don't get it! The CRAZY women with 6 kids who is never happy. She got her man she got her kids, and she still can't keep him happy. All I can say is what goes around comes around. She broke up a marriage to get what she wanted. Brad deserves all he gets.... The only thing I thing I feel bad about is these children. What a crazy wacked out mother!
January 10th, 2010 3:55 PM
go jen i hope u win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 15th, 2009 11:15 AM
as long as they have been together and 6 kids grow up
November 13th, 2009 5:23 PM
I gotta say I agree. Jen can boo-whoo all she wants but it's kept her bony ass in the headlines for the past 5 years cuz it sure as hell wasn't her acting chops or the lackluster movies she's made.
November 12th, 2009 6:43 PM
Think aniston would have little relevancy if not for the triangle. She can't forever convincingly play the "cute, quirky girl who's not complete till she gets her man" (usually about 3-5 min before the end) and hasn't shown much ability at drama. Think the rags wouldn't exist (certainly not this many of them) without the triangle, it's kept them in the black for over 4 years and they have little interest in dropping the storyline any time soon. Aniston and her PR machine began this early on with the VF interview (and others that followed). The breaking down crying twice, "screaming at the ocean", "pity party", "I was shocked, the world was shocked, a "divorce she never wanted" sound bites were deliberate and set the stage for the villain/victim scenario to follow. I think the rags run these lies on their own, with timely assists (what Angelina did was really uncool) from the ex. think aniston initially benefitted but now is feelng the more negative effects of the strategy. She'll alway
November 12th, 2009 4:17 PM
Jan
Her two latest movies bombed BIG TIME and made no proif! Where were all the people who think she is cute and classy? They certainly did not bring their butts to the movie theatres to see her two latest bombs. And the reviews were devastating! She is struggling to get funding for her next bomb The Baster, and no financier worth his salt will throw good money after bad.
She pays a PR team to keep her in the public eye. You know that as well as I do so let's not play "pretend we are dumb about Jen's PR people and their tactics" okay?
Who do you think is keeping these slag trashy articles alive? As long as Jen has money to pay her greedy PR people they will keep spending her money down to the last dime. I wish she would wake up and stop letting them use her for their own salacious gains. I have that much sincere feeling for her.
November 12th, 2009 2:05 PM
please suki enough of the jen keeping the stories alive to keep her movies she has made profit time and again and people think she is cute and classy and better off without peewee. i would pick john mayer or even the model paul over a non personality morphing manny like pitt. she has moved on so should you and the mags. you sound like one of those people that believe in aliens with this jens pr team making up stories.
November 12th, 2009 1:54 PM
Aniston's PR people keep these stupid articles going because Aniston cannot keep a man in her life and to take the focus off of Aniston's movies that bomb big time. Her PR people plant these stories and then turn around and deny them to keep her relevant in the tabloid news.
As long as Aniston is without a man in her life and, in her own words, "the symbol of the Loney Emblem" her PR people want Angelina to have no peace. It is all about Jen's Revenge! Because she was sooo humiliated when Brad dumped her 5 long years ago. Sheesh - when will this nonsense stop?
Aniston needs to get her PR people to stop planting these foolish lies. But will she? That is the question.
November 12th, 2009 1:11 PM
Why does Maniston look cross-eyed on that cover? LOL