Will we be seeing Miley Cyrus nude in the new issue of Vanity Fair?
The following, screen capped photo of an Entertainment Tonight story certainly makes it seem that way, doesn't it? Granted, the trashy celebrity news program may be trolling for ratings, purposely misleading its viewers with an ad that appears to show the Hannah Montana star in the buff.
However, based on a handful of recent, controversial, racy Miley Cyrus photos, questions have been raised about the innocent image of the actress/singer. This picture won't help matters.
We'll have more on the Miley Cyrus (possibly topless) photo shoot for Vanity Fair as the pics emerge.
Share
58 Comments
April 27th, 2008 4:03 PM
she's clearly not topless!! what's all the buzz about? plus the pic is awesome
April 27th, 2008 8:31 PM
'Tasteful' or not... Aren't 'suggestive' photos of underage children considered PEDOPHILIA?
April 27th, 2008 10:34 PM
As for the topless part... get a life you pervs, she isn't topless. Personally, I really don't even think the picture is that provocative. For that matter, she is abit of a bowser in the making anyways.
English version of Miley Ray Cyrus Vanity Fair Article
April 27th, 2008 10:36 PM
Samara Morgan LOL!!!!
April 27th, 2008 10:47 PM
I'm neither a fan, or have kids who are, but as a mom:
Also saw that disgusting story about Miley (p.s, she's only 15 right?!) showing a bit of skin last week - how the hell is this a news or even entertainment story, for anyone but pedophiles? why am i interested in a 15 year old showing - anything!!! yuck. and now this. first, it's a little gross. the makeup is overdone for the image she tries to portray, and her age - looking like Fiona Apple on drugs. the problem brings me to my second point, she has a posture of a child, so it's all weird to try to sex her up. She looks like a scrawny kid, trying to look like a rocker on drugs. Why would they do this to this kid? why can't we depend on more than parents, but all parents and adults to look out not just for their children, but other people's as well. would they want someone to do this to their child, to sell magazines? disgusting. and last of all, i had to log in, not to see the stupid pics, but to post that i think we should stop posting kiddie porn on "legitimate" news sources!
shame on all the adults involved in this exploitation for money! and my sympathies to the Cyrus family for trusting that they were putting the welfare of their child in the care of responsible adults, with morals and a conscience.
April 28th, 2008 5:43 AM
I think the picture is atristic and beautiful
April 28th, 2008 9:06 AM
I'm just a little disappointed....I hope it is not a beginning of you Know what.
I think you are a very talented young lady....we speak of your talents at work and anywhere...In my opinion you are excellent and you don't need this kind of publicity...sincerely Raffaela
April 28th, 2008 2:50 PM
sweet niblets, did she take these pictures for jesus too? this girl is a disgrace! what kind of a role model?! how dare she pretend to find missing puppies and try and make the whole world think she is a little miss wonderful! how can all of you just sit back and watch her try and deceive us all! well! let me tell you something, i will NOT be deceived! i see right through that little smirky smile! a picture is worth a thousand words, folks. and i think these pictures pretty much say it all!
April 28th, 2008 3:53 PM
It is you people that is what is wrong with this society not her. She is only showing her upper back. Are you judgemental prudes that far gone? If she was wearing a two piece bathing suit that that would be showing 10 times more, would you also be having a heart attack? This sounds like Saudi Arabia and not America. You self righteous people are pathetic.
April 28th, 2008 4:21 PM
dude, she's not naked! it's not like it's porn either. it's tasteful.
people need to chill out