Mom Shoots Intruder 5 Times, Saves Children
by Hilton Hater at .Score one for the NRA?
A woman in Walton County Georgia save her children from an introducer on Friday - by firing six bullets into his neck and face.
According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the unnamed female hid with her two kids in a crawl space after an ex-convict later identified as Paul Ali Slater repeatedly rang her doorbell.
Once he forced his way inside via crowbar…
“He opens the closet door and finds himself staring down the barrel of a .38 revolver,” Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman told the newspaper, adding that the woman connected on five of her six shots and fled to a neighbor's house while Slater lay on the ground bleeding.
Slater somehow remained conscious and made it to his car, only for authorities to quickly find him in a driveway. He told them he was "dying" and was transported to Gwinnett Medical Center.
“That mother’s instinct kicked in,” Chapman said. “You go after a mother’s kids and she’ll find herself capable of doing things she never thought she was capable of.”
Related Stories
-
Oklahoma Mom Reunites With Son After Tornado: See the Emotional Video -
Lesbian Couple Can't Cohabitate Due to "Morality Clause" in Divorce Papers
-
Bully Forced to Wear Heinous Clothes By Mom as Punishment: Right or Wrong?
Comments (18 Total)
Hooray for this courageous mom. Take that all you stupid fucking gun control idiots! None of you care that, had this woman been unable to arm herself because of morons that want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, she and her kids would have been robbed, raped, killed, or possibly all of the above. We ought to hear more stories like this. There is an old saying that "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." If that POS in the White House gets his way, then our future ability to defend ourselves goes right down the toilet - where he (and every gun control advocate in this country) belongs.
@Roger If in military service you mean the ability to protect ourselves from our own government if need be. That is actually what the 2nd amendment was set in place for. So if we were ever to be put in a position where the government abused their power over the people, the people would be able to defend themselves against it. Now of course they were not talking about the extensive technologies we have now, because there was none. Rest assure that those would also apply if they had. How else would we be able to protect ourselves from such things, or are we to be sheep lead only by the name of American anymore? The 2nd amendment was for citizens protection, not against foreign oppression, but our own. Don't chastise a foreigner unless you yourself truly understand what our Constitution is about. Arrogance at America's finest. Half truths based on unresearched second hand facts.
The ameriCAN society is so bad, that's the reason GOD decided to destroy it, it doesn't work. Few years ago the 10 Commandments were removed from various city councils around the nations, with what do you think if fill the empty place instead of 10 Commandments? With the devil's presence for when is not devil is GOD and when is devil is not GOD, that's the way it works but you got to be patient and to learn not to say as I heard many times : "I read the Bible 5 times", I am telling you most of the time dose bad than good for the person take what he wants rather to learn ACADEMICALLY from qualified people, people has wrong personality if it is not with GOD the Creator.
Mom's a hero. Too bad she didn't kill the SOB.
There is nothing wrong with having a handgun or other for personal protection. I personally would never have one in my home but I'm Canadian and from a small town lol. The biggest worry we have here is running out of milk at the grocrey store haha, the problem with some Americans is that they don't seem to understand there is a difference between self protection from an intruder and having ten assault rifles hanging around in the closet "just incase" they aren't called "self protection rifles". Then you get some maniac going on about the second amendment, when they don't know the other amendments other than "yeeeeeeera freedum of speech yeeeeera America!" when the second amendment was written, I'm sure they aren't talking about rapid fire large magazine high caliber weaponry considering they had swords, knives, flint locks and muskets for self protection. Get it togeather America!
They aren't called assault rifles either, those have been illegal and highly regulated in the US since before most of us were born. Since you are Canadian I will forgive your lack of knowledge with regard to our Constitution. The 2nd Amendment isn't about hunting or even personal protection. Go read it and the writings of the founding fathers. The intent was clearly to give the average citizen access to arms that could realistically be used in military service. While that has a limit, such as automatic weapons, tanks, explosives, and such it doesn't wasn't strictly even about guns and certainly had nothing to do with flint-lock or just whatever was common at the time. The Supreme Court has already upheld this fact and it's actually very clear for anyone that's educated. I don't see a problem with some controls and background checks for things like high-capacity magazines and certain semi-auto rifles. That's probably a good thing and something I've wanted for years. The problem is that as soon as they start banning weapons these people won't stop until they are all gone. They know they can't do it all at once but they want to keep the common man from owning a firearm, meanwhile they are protected by armed security.
If in military service you mean the ability to protect ourselves from our own government if need be. That is actually what the 2nd amendment was for. So if we were ever to be put in a position where the government abused their power over the people, the people would be able to defend themselves against