Lindsay Lohan Plea Deal: REJECTED By Train Wreck!
Well, this comes as a surprise ... and yet not. Lindsay Lohan apparently will NOT take the plea deal the judge offered in her felony grand theft case.
The troubled star, who insists she is innocent and did not steal that $2,500 necklace, will proceed to trial and hope to remain free in the meantime.
Lindsay's case is now assigned to Judge Stephanie Sautner - considered "a tough but fair" judge - with a preliminary hearing is set for April 22.
She faces both jail and prison as the case moves on. Here's why ...
If Judge Sautner thinks Lindsay Lohan violated probation, she could be jailed pending trial. Then, if Lindsay is convicted of grand theft, state prison beckons.
The fact that she could be thrown in jail for a probation violation before her grand theft trial made a plea bargain and three months in jail seem pretty light.
Still, it wasn't without its own set of risks. If she copped a plea, which she was considering seriously, she would have been placed on three years' probation.
LiLo? Staying clean for three years? ROFL. Might as well go b@lls out now.
In short, she's hoping the judge will NOT rule on the probation violation until a verdict is reached in the grand theft case, and that she'll be cleared there.
Smart move? You tell us: Should Lindsay have taken the plea deal?
View Poll »
Related Posts
- Dharun Ravi Sentenced to 30 Days in Jail For Role in Tyler Clementi Suicide
- Timothy Busfield Accused of Sexual Battery After Alleged Movie Date Fondling
- Dog the Bounty Hunter: Targeted With Death Threats
- New John Travolta Accuser: Gym Employee Alleges Groping
March 25th, 2011 7:27 PM
Why does anyone still care about this dumb twit anymore? She has no reason to be famous. Rachel McAdams acted circles around her in Mean Girls and LiLo has not made a movie in years that anyone actually spent money to go see.
I hope she does REAL TIME. In prison. For years.
Rank: D-Lister
March 25th, 2011 4:26 PM
No LL fan, but the woman in the store knew she had the necklace on, and stood and joked with her for quite some time while letting her try on other things. So why didn't the woman speak up WHEN LL went to walk out of the store with the thing then? And barring that, why didn't the woman call 911 RIGHT AFTER she walked out. Instead, SEVERAL DAYS PASS before someone calls the cops? Methinks the woman made a mistake (by not getting a loan document signed) and is trying to hook the blame on LL. Shame on her.
March 25th, 2011 12:22 PM
Let her be,nobody is inocent,we are all guilty to one offence or the other best known to us.What will be will be.
March 25th, 2011 11:47 AM
MY-O-MY!!!! WHAT A WOMAN!!! SHE DRIVES ME CRAZY!!!! THE MORE TROUBLE SHE GETS INTO THE MORE I DIG HER!!!! REALLY, WOULD'NT YOU LOVE TO PARTY WITH HER??? I KNOW I WOULD!!!! IT WOULD BE THE TIME OF MY LIFE!!!
March 25th, 2011 12:04 AM
It's good you rewrote the original article, but you could still be libel for the original-who knows, maybe nobody reads this stuff anyway
March 24th, 2011 2:05 PM
Linsey Lohan's a FREAK! i liked her in mean girls tho....lol
March 23rd, 2011 7:06 PM
seriously whats with the puke brown pleather dress? its hideous.
March 23rd, 2011 4:10 PM
Oh puh-leeze somebody, judge, your honor, put this girl away already, lock the door and throw away the key. Hasn't she gotten away with enough, short of murder, or will that be her next act??