Carrie Prejean: Pants Still on Fire!
Unlike her reaction to gay couples, Carrie Prejean has never met a lie she didn't embrace.
Just a few hours before we learn whether this deceitful traditional marriage lover will keep her Miss California crown or not, another untruth regarding Prejean has been uncovered.
A few days ago, celebrity gossip site TMZ claimed it had received a number of semi-nude photos of the beauty queen. However, it refused to post them because Carrie's rep said the pics were taken when his client was just 17 years old.
But now a Miss California pageant sponsor has told the website otherwise.
In an email sent by the anonymous sponsor, he says Prejean sent him one of the topless pics after January 6, 2009 (the date on which Carrie got a boob job) and asked "if she was in good enough shape for the Miss USA Pageant."
If this story is correct, Prejean would have been well over 18 when the pics were taken, marking the second time she's lied about their existence and/or history.
Can we please give the Miss California title to Tami Farrell already?!?
Related Posts
- It's a Girl for Carrie Prejean!
- Carrie Prejean: Pregnant!
- Shanna Moakler to Carrie Prejean: Shame on You!
- Carrie Prejean and Kyle Boller: Married!
Rank: New User
May 16th, 2009 1:56 AM
Prejean-Miss Hypocrite
Carrie Prejean, the Miss California contestant, was correct about homosexuality! It is mortal filth
and condemned by God's Word...but Prejean poses semi nude and topless EXPOSING HER
BREASTS and revealing the bottom of her buttocks...then lied about it...and then she parades
her body around in the Miss California Pageant EXPOSING HER PARTIAL BREASTS and
buttocks in a sexual immoral swimsuit before the world! She is 100% a HYPOCRITE and
she does NOT represent Jesus Christ nor a Christian!!
Jesus said it this way, "Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery
with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better
for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into Hell." [Mt. 5:28,29]
May 11th, 2009 5:46 PM
How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
May 11th, 2009 5:11 PM
[It's still legal - and always God-honoring - to air messages like the following. (See Ezekiel 3:18-19.) In light of government backing of raunchy behavior (such offenders were even executed in early America!), maybe the separation we really need is the "separation of raunch and state"!]
In Luke 17 in the New Testament, Jesus said that one of the big "signs" that will happen shortly before His return to earth as Judge will be a repeat of the "days of Lot" (see Genesis 19 for details). So gays are actually helping to fulfill this same worldwide "sign" (and making the Bible even more believable!) and thus hurrying up the return of the Judge! They are accomplishing what many preachers haven't accomplished! Gays couldn't have accomplished this by just coming out of closets into bedrooms. Instead, they invented new architecture - you know, closets opening on to Main Streets where little kids would be able to watch naked men having sex with each other at festivals in places like San
May 11th, 2009 12:37 PM
haha, Punisher - I've never once seen the word "porno" in conjunction with Prejean. Cite that evidence if you wish to use.
Her pics are half-nude. That's not an opinion. It's a fact. Same goes for SI models... but they are paid to pose that way! Prejean specifically violated her contract to pose this way. Talk about apples and oranges....
Why do you specifically mention what the Bible says against homosexuals and murderers, yet leave out what it says about wearing two kinds of material at once? You people think that hiding behind the Bible makes you less bigoted, but it just means you're exploiting religion while also denying basic human rights.
May 11th, 2009 12:32 PM
So, just to understand your view, "Punisher," along with many others that use your logic: Everybody sins, Jesus specifically due to this fact... yet pretty much the only group of people who aren't allowed to sin are homosexuals? Even though the Bible refers to eating two kinds of shell fish as an "Abomination" in the exact same Leviticus Book at it mentions homosexuality?
That's very convenient for everyone that simply thins gays are weird.
May 11th, 2009 12:18 PM
"Is no one allowed to be judges on views, as long as the Bible is cited for them?"
Of course. But in this case, folks who try to mock Prejean by saying what the Bible says this or that deserves to be judged for appealing to the Bible hypocritically. Trying to mock her by proving she is a sinner and then saying the Bible does not allow one to be a Christian and sinner make the mockers look foolish to those who know better.
All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God(Romans 3:23).
But if anybody does sin, we have one who speaks to the Father in our defense- Jesus Christ the righteous one(1 John 2:1).
If we claim we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us(1 John 1:8).
Do those who attack Prejean for being a sinner know the Bible state these things that we are all sinners and even as believers, we still are sinners who strive not to sin?
I rest my case.
May 11th, 2009 12:12 PM
"a) How is the author a hypocrite if he/she never said he/she cared what Jesus thought? This person is simply calling out Prejean for citing the Bible for one tiny, specific example (regarding gay marriage), yet seemingly not living any other aspect of her life according to a code of morality."
Prejean did not bring her religious views into the public. The pageant did by asking her a question and then kept attacking her til she fought back publically.
And you are sadly mistaken about Christians. Christians do not claim to be perfect. Christians do not claim they live to biblical standards of morality. We claim only Christ can do that. But we do claim that since Christ forgives us by faith, He does send us out to bear His message of truth in love. The Bible does not teach sinless Christians. Apparently, folks wishing to bash her Christianity ignore that part of the Bible, which is basically all of it (given the fallenness of man started from the first book of the Bible, Genesis).
May 11th, 2009 10:59 AM
To Punisher:
a) How is the author a hypocrite if he/she never said he/she cared what Jesus thought? This person is simply calling out Prejean for citing the Bible for one tiny, specific example (regarding gay marriage), yet seemingly not living any other aspect of her life according to a code of morality.
b) So, according to your logic, serving Jesus is only reserved for sinners? Is there a limit to this understanding of the Bible? If a serial killer referred to passages in the Bible that recommend stoning people, would he/she be let off because, hey, sinners are the target audience for this text? Is no one allowed to be judges on views, as long as the Bible is cited for them?
c) Are you really making a comparison between SI swimsuit models and Prejean? The difference is that the former are paid precisely to get half-naked, while the latter's half-naked pics were entirely against the rules of the pageant. You couldn't come up with two more opposing examples if you tried.
May 11th, 2009 10:21 AM
Since folks ask what would Jesus say, let me turn that on them.
What would Jesus say about folks like you appealing to what He would think, when you don't care what He really thinks, to mock those who strive to live for Jesus but admittedly are not perfect (which is what serving Jesus is all about, since only those who know they are sinners know they need Him to be their Saviour for their sins)?
What would Jesus think of those who resort to this tactic to ridiculue another's faith while claiming the name of Jesus to do so?
What would Jesus say about those, in invoking His name, who mock someone failing to always meet up to the biblical standards of morality (which Jesus never said anyone, but Himself, would be able to fulfill fully, or otherwise He would not have to die for their sins), in order to cover for their own lack of standards or disregards for biblical morality?
Who are the real hypocrites here?
May 11th, 2009 8:31 AM
Caught in a lie? According to Miss USA folks who have said that she lost because they did not like her answers then change story that she would have lost no matter what answer she give because she was losing, now that they realize the public is against them? According to these same folks who deny they told her to apologize but then turn around and said she was told to say she did not mean to offend and she would make amends with those she hurt? The same folks who outed her on breast implants unethically when they have no right revealing her privacy? The same folks who probably release the photos?
These bunch of unethical liars accuse her of lying and you buy that just because they say so and you dislike her? Pathetic.
Funny folks accuse of her of lying for stating she has never been nude or semi-nude when she signed up for Miss USA. If that is semi-nude or nude, then how come you folks do not condemn Sports Illustrated covers when some of them over the years have similar or even