Was She Hurt?
It doesn't appear that way, despite Eason sharing this photo of Ensley along with the aforecited video.
We're Sure It Was Scary for the Infant
We're certainly not saying otherwise. It must have been traumatic AF.
Read Eason's Defense of His Actions
"I dont give a damn what animal bites my baby on the face... whether it be your dog or mine, a dog is a dog and I dont put up with that shit at all. I'm all about protecting my family, it is my lifes mission. Some people are worth killing or dying for and my family means that much to me," he wrote as a caption to this video and photo.
And He Concluded:
"You can hate me all you want but this isnt the first time the dog bit Ensley aggressively. The only person that can judge weather or not a animal is a danger to MY CHILD is ME."
Heck no!!!! If the dog has been a danger to his children before, and if this was the final straw, as David implies, there's a solution that does NOT include shooting the animal in cold blood: Just give it away. There are plenty of shelters around that would accept the dog and maybe even try to rehabilitate it or find it a family without any kids.
Seriously, Dude. What the Actual F-ck?!?
No one takes issue with you keeping your daughter safe, you racist A-Hole. But your very own video makes it clear you didn't shoot Nugget in the middle of some attack. This wasn't an emergency.