Comments (30 Total)


You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Sign In or Register


Avatar
Reply
corinna

I am a married mother of 3 i use birth controll because i as a responsible adult know i can not care for anymore children even with me and my husband both working full time jobs if u want to pay for my kids ill be happy to have as many as i can and if having sex with my husband makes me a slut then so be it

Avatar
Reply
Gavion E Chandler~

From the point of view that Rush presented I find it hard to argue his points. I do think that Birth control for medical reasons should be covered, but by the case presented by Sandra Fluke that she wants the government to support her sexual habits not the medical needs. I am not a fan of Rush... actually I don't like the man one bit, but to put this in order I thought this whole thing was about religious morality, where religious ideology sought its moral sensibilities the ability and the power to mandate and influence the governmental disposition towards one particular stand of a people and those laws that govern them. If such a thing happens church and its religion will rule the people in the tyranny of all its hopes and fears. Religion and its dogmatic literature has no place in government. That is why our forefathers had the separation of church and state.

Avatar
Reply
Gavion E Chandler~

But after listening to Rush... he did not state her to be a slut or a prostitute, rather it was her own words and demands upon the state to supply birth control to support her 'Habit' not the need of Birth control. And I would also include Viagra in this as well. If it is not a medical need, then the government should not expected to support the habits of individuals. That would be equivalent to the Government handing out a check to an alcoholic so that he can by his or her booze.

Avatar
Reply
Gavion E Chandler~

From the point of view that Rush presented I find it hard to argue his points. I do think that Birth control for medical reasons should be covered, but by the case presented by Sandra Fluke that she wants the government to support her sexual habits not the medical needs. I am not a fan of Rush... actually I don't like the man one bit, but I thought this whole thing was about religious morality, where religious ideology sought its moral sensibilities the ability and the power to mandate and influence the governmental disposition towards one particular stand of a people and those laws that govern them. If such a thing happens church and its religion will rule the people in the tyranny of all its hopes and fears. Religion and its dogmatic literature has no place in government. That is why our forefathers had the separation of church and state.

Avatar
Reply
pegvolz

I'm not 100% behind the words Mr. Limbaugh used; but where are the new words we should use for paid sex? Just curious. Also what about me having to pay part of the overhead for the corner prostitutes (is that too offensive a word?)and their Pimps and their johns (I'm sure they ALL don't bring protection. Seems like everyone has protection that will be paid for by ME and I don't want to be in their BEDROOM activities, so pay for your sex YOURSELF,just like I have to pay for arthritis meds by myself, over the counter and NOT cheap!