by Hilton Hater at . Comments

According to Kris Humprhies, Kim Kardashian never really loved him and only entered in to a 72-day marriage for the sake of publicity and money.

Still, Kris is totally out to get back at Kim, according to the latest issue of OK! Weekly... by getting back together with his ex. That will show her!

A Revenge Romance

Anonymous sources tell the tabloid that Humphries never really got over Bianka Kamber, a Toronto native he dated for two years before meeting Kardashian.

"Bianka was his first love," explains an insider to OK!. "She's a very down-to-earth, sweet girl. He admits he wants to win her back."

First, though, Humphries must legally become a single man, a step he's reportedly hesitant to make because he's holding out for a big payday. Will he get it? Will Kamber take him back? Who will Kim date next? We can totally wait to find out!

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Only Kris Humphries - and PETA - can paint Kim Kardashian in a positive light...

According to an E! News insider, a divorce settlement is yet to be signed between this briefly-married pair because the bruising NBA power forward is hoping to holdout for a payday beyond the offer on the table.

  • Kris Humphries on the Nets
  • K. Kardashian

"Kris is dragging it out," claims this Kardashian source. "Kim is ready to move on, but Kris is hoping that stretching it out will get him even more money."

As has been previously reported, this mole says Humphries wants to bank $7 million from the split… or $1 million less than his one-year contract with the New Jersey Nets. In exchange, reports have said he'll keep silent about supposedly damaging facts related to the failed union.

But "Kim never considered signing something like that," this insider says. "Kris can't take the time to consider [her] offer, but he finds time to do an interview with a tabloid magazine."

Ohhh, zing! It's important to keep this source in mind, too, of course. It's E! Online. Which pretty much views Kim Kardashian and her family as its personal ATM.

Seriously, Kris, Kim and those at E! who promote these people make the Nets look like winners.

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Following her sister's flour bombing last week at the hands of an irritating PETA activist, Khloe Kardashian announced to the world yesterday that she was through with the company for whom she posed naked in 2008 (below).

The Kardashian Klan

In response, PETA has issued a statement that basically say: we understand. But your sister still sucks!

"We appreciate that Khloé will remain on the animals' side by not wearing fur - that's what counts," a rep for PETA tells E! News. "If one of our volunteers is responsible, it doesn't alter the fact that no animal deserves to be electrocuted, shot or poisoned for a bit of fur clothing.

Khloé is just defending her sister, and we know she has a good heart, so we wish her well. We just wish she also had more influence on her sister."

Sigh. Talk about a battle where this is no winner. Whose side do you take in the PETA versus Kim Kardashian feud?

 

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

It seems likely that Kim Kardashian did not, for once, orchestrate her latest PR bonanza.

According to TMZ, the woman behind this idiot's flour bombing late last week is Christina Cho, an infamous PETA activist known for disrupting events in order to get that organization's message out. In 2010, for example, she grabbed a microphone from designer Donna Karan and condemned the use of fur in fashion.

Christina, whose sister is a top PETA official, won an award from the group two years ago for her efforts.

PETA, meanwhile, has denied any involvement in the flour bombing, although it's been clear that it stands behind the culprit.

Kardashian said over the weekend that she will press charges against Cho, while PETA responded that the ex-sex tape star should get a life.

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

After speaking to her PR team and being told what to do thinking about the act of violence perpetrated against her on a Los Angeles red carpet last week, Kim Kardashian has decided to press charges against the woman who threw flour all over her.

She will reportedly contact law enforcement officials over the next few days and take the appropriate steps.

Kardashian Picture

In response to this decision, PETA has gone on the attack against Kardashian. That lame organization denies involvement in the act, but has released a statement that reads:

If she presses charges, at least people will be constantly reminded of her selfish, callous disregard for the cruel deaths that she causes by wearing fur.

How much better it would be if she decided to evolve and enhance her image by donating her vulgar furs and exotic-animal skins to the homeless. The activist acted from the heart, something Kim doesn't seem to have. If anything, Kim should get a life, the very thing that she denies animals.

What do you think? Should Kardashian press charges against her attacker?

 

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Kris Jenner is acting like both a mother and a manager in light of her daughter getting flour bombed during a fragrance launch in Los Angeles.

The Kardashian matriarch took to her blog yesterday and commented on just how well Kim handled the unusual incident, writing:

"I am so proud of my daughter for handling this situation so professionally and with such poise!.Kim wasn't phased by the attack and simply walked away from the red carpet, brushed herself off and headed right back out!!"

Kim actually is now considering pressing charges against the culprit, who was detained and released and NOT hired by PETA, that awful organization insists.

Jenner then concluded: "Thanks to everyone at Lighthouse Beauty and The London Hotel for such a fantastic event, and for handling the situation so well."

Ah, yes, there it is: the plug. Kris likely made thousands with that sentence alone. Are we sure the Kardashians didn't orchestrate this attack?

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Upon dousing Kim Kardashian with flour last night, a woman reportedly referred to the reality star as a "Fur Hag!"

Does this mean PETA, who has called out the ex-sex tape star in the past for her fur coat affections, orchestrated the attack? No, the organization insists. But that doesn't mean it's sad the incident took place.

"It was not [us]," a rep for PETA tells TMZ, adding: "PETA has tried everything from polite letters to public protests, but Kim Kardashian has not been moved by the news that animals are beaten, electrocuted, and even skinned alive for real fur garments. Whoever threw that flour may reach her when our polite appeals did not."

And, hey, if flour is unsuccessful, no doubt a message from Courtney Stodden will do the trick.

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Kim Kardashian has been flour bombed.

As previously reported, the professional celebrity was doing what she does best last night in Los Angeles - posing on a red carpet - when a young woman ran up and doused her with a bag of white powder later identified as basic cooking flour.

"I'm fine," Kardashian told E! News after the incident. "You have to laugh it off! I brushed off and came right back out."

She also didn't press charges against the culprit, who was detained by police and then released. What does it say that a tiny percentage of the THG staff wonders whether Kim concocted this flap on her own for the sake of publicity and sympathy? Just the obvious, we suppose.

Watch footage from the event now:

by Hilton Hater at . Comments
This is so not kool, people.Kim Kardashian White Powder Pic

During an event at the London Hotel in West Hollywood last night, Kim Kardashian was walking the red carpet when a woman ran up and tossed white powder all over the reality star's back and hair.

You can see the before-and-after shots from the fragrance launch below, with Kim being led away, following the assault, in the latter photo:

  • Kim Kardashian on a Red Carpet
  • Kim Kardashian White Powder Pic

The fire department was called in to determine the powder was simply cooking flour and police have detailed the assailant, who really is a moron.

If you aren't a fan of Kim Kardashian, ignore her on Facebook and Twitter. Don't make her sympathetic in the eyes of the public and definitely don't give her a reason to make more headlines.

Seriously, even Jon Hamm would not approve of this idiotic act.

UPDATE: Watch footage from the Kim Kardashian flour bomb now!

[Photo: B. Dowling/WENN.com]

by Hilton Hater at . Comments

Incredibly, hilariously, and totally awesomely, Jon Hamm is apparently at it again.

In an interview with Time Out London, the actor was asked about his status as a sex symbol and told the publication:

“The sexy thing is so ephemeral and meaningless other than in the world of selling magazines. Who cares, when it's reduced to just that? You might as well be a Kardashian and have a sex tape.”

Yes! Burn!

  • A Total Hamm
  • Kardashian, Kim

This dig, of course, follows Hamm's reference to Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian as "idiots" who serve as examples of how stupidity is rewarded in our culture. He's mostly stuck by these comments, too.

Jonathan Cheban (we know: who?!?) also upped the ante this week by saying his friend is more popular than the multiple-time Emmy winner.

Whose side are you on in this feud?

 

Kim Kardashian Biography

Kim Kardashian, Boobs Kim Kardashian is the ex-girlfriend of Nick Cannon, Reggie Bush and Ray J. She had intercourse on camera with the former, which is what... More »
Born
Birthplace
Los Angeles, California
Full Name
Kimberly Noel Kardashian

Kim Kardashian Quotes

So far, designing is the most exciting thing I’ve done... I have a vision of what I want [the clothes] to look like in my mind and it’s fun to see it come alive on paper.

Kim Kardashian

He just seemed very firm about the change, and that’s, like, his motto.

Kim Kardashian [on Barack Obama]
× Close Ad