Should Nadya Suleman lose her kids?

Nadya Suleman Nude
Like Us On Facebook

More From The Hollywood Gossip

Octomom-as-angelina-jolie

Who'd you rather, Angelina or Octomom?

Who'd you rather, Angelina or Octomom?
Octo-on-the-view

Should Octomom be allowed to smoke weed?

Should Octomom be allowed to smoke weed?
Pole

Octomom vs. Random Fan: Who'd win a debate?

Who would win a debate featuring Octomom and a random fan?
Octomom-topless-photo

What do you think of Octomom's 'Sexy Party' single?

What do you think of Octomom's 'Sexy Party' single?

Tags:
Related Polls:
Nadya Suleman Polls
Related Posts:
Created by:
Created at:
Avatar

Octomom thought she would be rolling in money..but 'poof.' Reality
set in and now we - the taxpayers - are supporting her and her brood. She would rather have hair designers, clothes, jewelry and
the good life (posing nude--ha!), so I say, give the kids a chance at life with families that can take care of them and let Octomon
get her tubes tied and drift away.

Avatar

If Ms Octomom has the resources for a come-to-your-home hairstylist, then she has the resources to take proper care of her 14 kids. If her house is really in such a squalid and unsanitary state, then yes, the kids should all be taken away and Ms Octomom forced to attend parenting classes to get them back. This is what happens to normal people. If she doesn't have the resources for proper help to care for her children, then she should still have them taken away, be forced into parenting classes, and any other education that will help her obtain job skills that can help support her kids. Then when a stable situation has been created, then bring the kids home. Then, with the help of charity (religious, public, and/or state) she can maintain a minimum standard of living. But that would mean giving up the designer clothes, sylists, bling, and parties. Why should she be getting special treatment?

Avatar

Suleman is disgusting. She has 14 children, no income, and not sense enough to wipe her own butt.

Avatar

Yeah, no-one with that many kids of the same age can capably take care of that number. Many years ago when large families were (more or less) the norm, they were of differing ages. The older ones helped with the younger ones. This woman is a good example of the term "Basket Case". I believe that she did this because she thought she could make a lot of money and have nannies and a huge house. WHAT A PITIFUL JOKE. These kids should be adopted out. THROW HER IN JAIL.

Avatar

FYI - I'm speaking in general terms as much as anything; not just about octo-mom.

Avatar

Needs a third option for the poll - it's not as easy as yes or no. Yes if she's unable; no if she's able to take care of them. Anyone would likely need help with 14 kids of course and the deck is stacked against her. But if she (or any of us) is able to successfully raise them well, and without neglect, then no one should have their kids ripped away from them. DCF is very necessary but their "power" is far too generous in my opinion. Yes, they have to prove everything but they can strip children from parents while they do so. If they turn out to be incorrect the family still pays a price - kids with no idea why they can't see mom or dad and parents horrified they'll never see their child again! I believe welfare of the child(ren) should be paramount...but that doesn't mean it's all black and white just because DCF says so...