You'd think she knows people are always lingerie in the shadows not that it is right.I am a photographer.I would never do those pictures especially to publish them.Even if it made me rich.But I do not think being naked is shameful.I Do think the story of what the Royal Family says is a bit funny. ""French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and totally unjustifiable manner."I didn't think Kates tatas were so great really if those were the true blurred crappy images.
Yup two ways of looking at it. No big deal, she's stunning, on vacation in Europe Sunbathing topless with her husband.
It is right for people to make money off Kate and Williams PRIVATE time, no. They weren't sitting on a public beach! I think the French paparazzi should pay through their noses, they contributed to the death of Diana
Now some off and get a life!
Leave them alone. The news should be that she is comfortable with her body and they care about each other.
why in the world whould she ven go outside and take of her top and she know there are paparazzi everwhere she go. fuck her maybe she know what she was getting her self into
I understand that everyone has their right to privacy, but when you are a public figure and know that there is someone waiting at every corner to take pictures of you, you gotta think twice before doing things like this. If you're going to go out in the open and take your top off, be ready for the paparazzi to take pictures. Kate knows that wherever she goes, the cameras follow. They can complain, whine, and threaten to sue all they want, but no one is complaining when Harry was in a hotel room and random girls were taking photos of him. But, because Kate was on a balcony in plain site, there's a problem?
In many countries in Europe toplessness on the beach is the norm. I would be teased for not going topless when I was there.
If they wanted **Privacy** they should go indoors or have screens, thus, I wonder if this really is $$exhibitionism$$ which because of their demanding position is almost always going to result even though not directly intentional, they do deserve **privacy**, but they have to be discriminating in a house they don't own--instead of this scenario, why, for example, couldn't they just go to a French beach on the Riviera and take the top off with the other topless gals--now that would have been...COOL....! And the photographers would have jihaded each other to get the greatest shot!! And the drone and satellite photographs...when will they be released by some Air Force Private? Her Royal Highness "Kate" should be paid the revenue from this magazine and as a fine a controlling interest and directorship in the company!! This would serve a precedent for any future magazines and photographers.
I'm sorry your privacy was invaded. It's as if someone was looking in your house window! All for MONEY! SHAME ON THE PHOTOGRAPHER! LEAVE THE DUCHESS ALONE!
It is only a big deal if you make it one. Let the pictures be shown and go on, looking good is a girls best revenge. and the girl looks great!
You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please
Submissions? Questions? Looking to advertise?
© 2013 The Hollywood Gossip - Celebrity Gossip and Entertainment News