He followed trayvon around. How in the world is that self defense? if he was in his house minding his own business then he wouldnt have been threatened...by the way i so dont understand how a bag of skittles and a tea bottle is threatening his life. Anyways after the police told him not to follow the boy he still did he even got out the car if anything Trayvon was the one who was threatened not him..thats why i dont understand why people are saying self defense when he is the one that followed trayvon...this is just blowing me
He followed trayvon around. How in the world is that self defense? if he was in his house minding his own business then he wouldnt have been threatened...by the way i so dont understand how a bag of skittles and a tea bottle is threatening his life. Anyways after the police told him not to follow the boy he still did he even got out the car if anything Trayvon was the one who was threatened not him..thats why i dont understand why people are saying self defense when he is the one that followed trayvon...this is just blowing
[ GET THAT FAT ASS BASTARD]
I'm not a fighter. Someone starts a fight with me, I end it how I can. If it's his life or my health, it's just a total no-brainer. I'm not the one who decided to get violent, why should I be the one to suffer?
It does sound like Zimmerman was being a total prick, and perhaps even harassing Martin. This makes it a little stickier, and really looks bad for Zimmerman -- he might be socially ruined. Given further evidence to confirm my hunches, I might agree to prosecute, but until then, all they are is hunches.
And I won't jail a man on a hunch until the day I'm willing to be jailed on a hunch.
To Martin's age, what do you need to do in order to defend yourself? "Excuse me, I know you're really busy beating the shight out of me, but would you mind showing me your I.D. so I know whether I can defend myself against you or just have to roll over and die?" To him being unarmed, so what? Is this a game or a contest or a tournament where you have to win fair and square? Somebody just started beating on you. They could kill you. If they don't they're still likely to injure you and cause you and your dependents much unnecessary hardship. What obligation do you have to put yourself through that? None.
Since when do two wrongs make a right? Nobody should be arrested, accused, or anything else in this situation, regardless of color or race or any other such nonsense. Saying this man should be prosecuted because a black man in the same situation might be prosecuted is like saying that everyone's home should be broken into and their pet/child shot because SWAT teams often do that to the less fortunate, and at least that way would even it out.
What about presumption of innocence? We really have no conclusive evidence that this wasn't self-defense, nor that it was. In light of the doubt, we can't convict, or suddenly every accused must be required to prove innocence rather than to simply not be proven guilty. If you prefer presumption of guilt because it might be safer, it abounds throughout the legal systems of the world, so please be my guest.
And I've never used Gus before. Definition.
A person who will not call his own people out when it's obvious they are wrong.
A person who will not live within the rules of a work environment yet will file discrimination when they are left out or let go.
A person who will sit and put on a front that all is well and when they come up short - they will play that " Throwdown" Race Card"! This of course shows their true intentions all along.
A person who can't wait to place his seed in a white female and then " Vanish" when the child is born. This Trait of Zero accountability is nothing more than - Premeditated Racism!
Someone who labels his own kind for speaking about the faults of his people! You get the brunt of it?
Mr. X, I have no idea how in the hell he can claim self defense. They need to get their ducks in a row before they make any arrest. Otherwise it may get kicked out for lack of evidence.
@Gus. I've given Blacks definition of what we say racism is, and it should be us to define such a term as we bore the brunt of it.
What's your definition of racism. I really want to know. And I didn't call you racist. I stated that I couldn't call you racist. And I'm more that sure that we've never crossed paths as I've never used the handle (Mr. X) before.
@ Mel/ Apologize for yourself. Don't dare apologize for me. You are the one to PREJUDGE !
You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please
Submissions? Questions? Looking to advertise?
© 2013 The Hollywood Gossip - Celebrity Gossip and Entertainment News