Terrell Owens: Four Baby Mamas, $0 Income
Terrell Owens may have had more reasons to off himself than originally thought. His fiscal situation is so grim, he filed papers in THREE SEPARATE child support cases to have his payments lowered, given that he makes a whopping $0.
He has four kids by four different ladies in all. Financially sound.
The former NFL star is currently waging legal battles with:
WHO: These four women. WHAT: Tens of thousands a month.
Monique Reynolds: T.O. and Monique have an 11-year-old son together. He paid $20,000 a month in support until last year, when it was reduced to $11,202.
Kimberly Floyd: They share a 7-year-old daughter, for whom T.O. was ordered to pay $20,000 a month for back in 2005. In 2008, that sum fell to $15,000.
Samelia Miller: Miller gave birth to a son by the football star back in 2006. He was ordered to pay $13,400 a month in support; That remains unchanged.
Melanie Paige Smith: Terrell Owens was ordered to pay $5,000 a month for their daughter back in 2007. He plans to request a "modification" here, too.
In each of the cases where T.O. is requesting a reduction in child support payments, he says in his declaration, "My currently monthly income is zero ($0)."
In the papers, T.O. also claims to pay $62,366/month for various properties, and has one already in foreclosure. That's almost worth a 911 call right there.
Related Posts
- Jeremy Lin Shoots Down Kim Kardashian Dating Rumors
- Kobe Bryant to Vanessa Bryant: I Won't Cheat on You Ever Again, I Swear!!
- ESPN Apologizes for Racist Jeremy Lin Headline
- New York Yankees Perfume: Actually Coming Soon!
January 25th, 2012 3:12 PM
I can't judge anyone else, because I am not perfect, but...condoms are useful. If you are a celebrity, you're child should be able to live above the poverty line and you are only liable for half of that child's support. You are not supposed to have to support that child's mother. So, I believe that $20,000 a month is way above the poverty line and the child's mother should be working outside the home and the courts should make that a stipulation. By not doing that, the court is telling that child it is okay to do the same thing it's mother is doing - living off of someone else and not trying to better one's self. Let's stop this vicious cycle and stand on our own two feet, ladies! Stop bringing children into this world so you can get a check!
January 24th, 2012 5:46 PM
It is mind-boggling to me. Why do these 'ballers' let themselves be seduced by these 'pretty women' who want them only for their money. If I was a professional player, a woman would have to submit a resume before I spent a dime on her. I just do not get it. If I was any of these men, I would not go to bed without a 'jacket'. Come on guys-wake-up!!!!! Use some restraint. Use some common sense. Watch your back. All that money down the drain! On what! I tell all my nephews, please do not be blinded by 'couchie'. Look for a woman who has her own career , someone who can add to your life not take away from your life.
January 4th, 2012 9:29 PM
OH PLEASE..you must be one of those welfare crack HO's selling your crack for crack?
You act like those women didn't sign up to be a mother when they spread their legs. All child support, regardless of wjat the bread earner makes, should be assigned to take care of HALF of the childs basic needs. In most places half is $300 per month so take that and don't let the door hit cha where the bulldog bitcha.
I make more than any of these sluts cause I went to college, grad school and work for a living to support my husband and 4 kids. Keep bringing innocent human beings into this world for the SOLE purpose of extracting money from strange men because you are too lazy to work. PATHETIC.
December 17th, 2011 12:00 PM
My man leenick 1 hit that shit on the nail, stay strong T.O
November 21st, 2011 9:49 PM
these women are nothing more than who@es...chasing these athletes and spreading them legs to get a meal ticket...and people wonder why there is such a low opinion of success chasers...what happened to the days when a woman went for a guy with a regular job? truely pathetic in this day and age that real men who work hard for a living are considered "scrubs" because we dont have multi-millions...well if that is what it takes for todays woman to notice you im ok passing them right on by..i am glad when i see them kicked back to the dirt pile them crawled out from...stay strong T.O. but man for petes sake where a condom and stop tricking yourself off.
November 18th, 2011 5:03 AM
Please... 20k is sufficient for the child of a celebrity....If he's living the high life, why not make it possible for your kid to attend the best schools, live in a good environment, have access to the things he or she needs. What about the mother who is there everyday, cooking for the kid, getting the kid ready for school, helping with homework, driving the kid everywhere he/she has to go. Waking up in the middle of the night when the kid is sick. Being both the mother and the father while T.O. is out skirt chasing? He's a public figure int he media who has pissed off some people. I'm sure that 20k goes toward protecting the safety of the child. and SO WHAT if the mother spends some of the money? If the child's needs are being met and the mother is filling in YOUR absent rold who cares if she buys a new pair of shoes. If you got a problem BE THERE and there won't be any child support issues... You people are so quick to judge the mother as a gold digger..if T.O. was so concerned abou
November 14th, 2011 5:55 PM
This is so typical of athletes and the groupies or jump offs that follow them around just to get a chance to spread those legs. I don't know why these men are not using condoms. There is no reason to pay these women 20,000 a month unless the child is handicapped and needs special medical attention. Terrel should only have to pay normal child support and I think 5,000 per month is sufficient and the mother should be working and not living off of the money paid for the child.
November 8th, 2011 4:36 AM
lol 20 thousand a month is definitely not necessary... thats 240 thousand dollars a year? thats more than most families make with two working parents combined...and dropping it to 10 thousand? thats still 6 digit salary for doing 0 work except raising a child...there should be no question that this is still a more than fair amount of money
Rank: D-Lister
November 8th, 2011 12:40 AM
well if you want you child to go to a private school to better his or her chance in the future, especially if you live in a bad area, then 20gs a month is needed.
November 7th, 2011 5:40 PM
TYPICAL, GHETTO GARBAGE.