Russell Crowe on Circumcision: Barbaric, Anti-God!

by at . Comments

Celebrities are all up in God's business these days.

First, Gwyneth Paltrow wondered if the bible truly preached intolerance against homosexuals.

Now, Russell Crowe is speaking up for the Big Guy Himself and asking about circumcision: What the heck, people?!?

Photo of Russell Crowe

“Circumcision is barbaric and stupid," the Oscar winner Tweeted yesterday. "Who are you to correct nature? Is it real that GOD requires a donation of foreskin? Babies are perfect. I will always stand for the perfection of babies, i will always believe in God, not man’s interpretation of what God requires."

And if you disagree with Crowe? If you dare take a scalpel to your child's private part?

"Unfollow and f-ck off," the actor wrote. "I’ll take attentive parenting over barbarism."

At least he's a man who stands up for his convictions, we guess. What do you think? Circumcision is...

 

[Photo: WENN.com]

Tags: ,
Avatar

Crowe is right. Just about all religions are rife with stupid and barbaric nonsense.

Avatar

Why should child mutalization be a decision of parents? Shall we allow these parents to cut off a leg if they so desire?

Avatar

Man has free will and is allowed to make whatever changes he sees fit to nature to help life in general. This is just another actor with limited intelligence and limited information spouting off. He is a great actor...he should stick to that area and not show us his obvious ignorance.

Avatar

In my country which is a Muslim country we circumcise our kids; so, what is it to you? Ever heard of "NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS?"

Avatar

He should do us all a favor and get the "head" on his shoulders circumsized.

Avatar

so disgusting, penis with foreskin,*vomiting* so unhygienic

Avatar

So Russell Crowe is equating observant Judaism with barbarism? Looks like we have another anti-Semite coming out of the closet. Oh, and he's so classy in his response to anyone who disagrees with him.

Avatar

I think all females should have big boobs. Small ones are not as attractive. When my daughter was born, we had a plastic surgeon go and insert rolled up bags in her chest. When she is older they will be filled so that she will appear more attractive to men. Doing this while she was a baby was better for her and us. Yes, it was painful for her, but she wasn't able to vocalize this or make a decision for herself. It's better to do it when they are babies so they won't feel as much pain if done as an adult. Also, when she grows up, if she decides she doesn't want them, it will be too late to reverse it. My child ~ My decision as a parent. Her body is not her own until she can speak!!

Avatar

The foreskin was created as a way to protect the urinary tract from dirt and grossness when being nakey. We don't need the foreskin anymore because we have underwear, soap, and pants. End of story. I've been to a Bris, baby cried really hard for all of two minutes, had a little wine and passed out. You say it's barbaric and archaic...well having a foreskin is archaic.

Avatar

Oh and since u asked @Kat ...Ive exper. both....and honestly my bf is uncircumsized ....And I love it...our sexual exper.are AMAZING and he is bigger than average and yes I just asked him what he thought and he said he wouldnt give up the extra nerves in his penis or the thickness for a small circumsized penis that u cant 100% feel everything...so whtever bitch...no good reason 4 it...its wrong...ppl started doing that back in the world war 1..when men were in the trenchs for days and water up past the belly along with disease and fungus and animals in the water men gt uti's and bacteria infections so they started circumsizing them like the jews.....read up on history b4 u run ur mouth hunny...lol

× Close Ad