Russell Crowe on Circumcision: Barbaric, Anti-God!

by at .

Celebrities are all up in God's business these days.

Tags: ,

From Around the Web

    More From The Hollywood Gossip

    Kate-upton-and-selena-gomez

    18 Stars We Can't Believe Are Somehow the Same Age

    Some of us age more gracefully than others. Check out these 20 stars who are the same age but be ready for the disbelief!
    Demi-lovato-responds-to-fatty-tweet

    Demi Lovato Responds to Haters with Love on Twitter, Tells Fans to Rise Above Bullying

    Demi Lovato will not be torn down by her haters. She encouraged fans to choose kindness over cruelty and spread the love, not hate.
    31-hilarious-reactions-to-the-us-airways-tweet_classic-amy-schumer

    US Airways Tweet Elicits Amazing Online Response: LOL Now!

    Yesterday's US Airways Tweet elicited some amazing reactions on Twitter. Relive them now.
    Mimi-sex-tape-with-nikko-smith

    Mimi Sex Tape Blows Up Twitter, Sparks Shower Rod Hashtag

    News of the Mimi Faust sex tape that hit the web Monday led to great discussion on Twitter and even a trending hashtag #MimiShowerRodStrongerThan.

    48 Comments New Comment Subscribe

    Avatar

    The 4skin has 16 functions that we know of, is half+ of the penile covering, has 65%-85% of the most erogenous receptors. So, tell me their isn't a plan. Really?! Now tell me, a guy doesn't want 75% more sexual receptors or wants half of his d*ck gone.
    Circumcision, Penile Reduction, Genital Cutting, Genital Scarification, Genital Mutilation, it all sexually handicaps.
    (for most their ability to multi orgasm with ejac (7x over 12 minutes with the same erection) and full body O's is severely limited or gone. CAN-FAP demonstrated video showed this multi 5 orgasmic ability using only each of the 5 most sensitive parts cut off by circumcision.
    ( see my facebook 'Notes' for all my circ / intact refs )

    Avatar

    The leading experts from 38 different countries co-authored a letter stating:

    "Only 1 of the arguments put forward by the American Academy of Pediatrics has some theoretical relevance in relation to infant male circumcision; namely, the possible protection against urinary tract infections in infant boys, which can easily be treated with antibiotics without tissue loss. The other claimed health benefits, including protection against HIV/AIDS, genital herpes, genital warts, and penile cancer, are questionable, weak, and likely to have little public health relevance in a Western context, and they do not represent compelling reasons for surgery before boys are old enough to decide for themselves."

    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.abstract

    Avatar

    Anyone who advocates male circumcision for cleanliness is advocating it for women as well, since they produce/retain more smegma than men, and by cutters' logic should have their clit hood and minor labia sliced away. (Think about that - women in these comments are lending support to the mutilation of their own genitals.)
    Cutting off part of your body has nothing to do with hygiene. Washing with soap and water does. Genital cutting is a silly tribal ritual that would not exist if it wasn't forced on unconsenting infants, who then grow up and feel compelled to keep this cultish blood rite going by carving their own children's private parts as well.
    If you believe universal mutilation is better than universal bathing, you're gross. And if you believe a parent has a right to slice live parts from his or her child, you're a disgrace.

    Avatar

    Maybe you're religious, maybe you're not. But you have to admit that having a ceremony in which the main event is cutting off part of a baby's penis is fucking weird.

    Avatar
    @ Dresden

    Wall of Flesh - the infant gets isolated doesn't get the instinctual protection of the parents by a wall of flesh being handed away through 7 pairs of hands in Jewish circ. , the mother goes off to another room with the women. In hospital circ they actually use the sound isolating walls away in another room and return the pain comatose sleeping child.

    Avatar

    @Tara..... all men, uncircumcised or circumcised, should clean their genitals everytime they take shower, like they clean their other body parts, and also after having sex. If neccesary, before having sex is also OK. Perhaps uncircumsed men just need about 10 seconds longer than circumcised men to clean their genitals because they need to clean the foreskin, but circumcised men can't get all the benefits of the foreskin anymore......., forever. Sure, God knows much much more than everyone in this world about human body and the life, and God has designed foreskin for all men.

    Avatar

    Uncircumcised men need to clean their junk before intimacy....some women may know what I'm talking about. Circumcision is for cleanliness purposes, its not anti-god, and its also a personal choice of the parent to have it performed on the infant. Also, God is neither for or against it....read your bible!

    Avatar
    @ Tara

    I've found that intact men tend to do a better job cleaning themselves down there than cut American guys, probably because they don't live under the delusion that being circumcised makes you "cleaner." I'm gay and with the experienced age 56. Likewise I hope you clean your drapes too.

    Avatar
    @ Frank+McGinness

    And when intact males have 75% more erogenous receptors, they will clean well, really well. Nudge nudge wink wink. In our society that pushes circumcision and vilify's the foreskin, father's have lost the knowledge to teach their sons to use a drop of baby oil which prevents any smell if so desired. Smell is the pheromones in the foreskin. What you don't like? Everyone is different. I Like.

    Avatar

    ---Crowe needs to circumscise his connections
    to the Fabian elite sellout of Australia, andf the
    world to Globalist RED China 'EUGENICS realism'
    values.

    Avatar

    Don't you know that after puberty ages, foreskin can be retracted back without any pain? This is an incridible mechanism of the human body to give enough skin for the penis shaft when erection happened. Foreskin also play role in giving sexual pleasures during sexual intercourse.

    Avatar

    I would not outlaw circumcision, but I do find it barbaric
    and for the women who find a foreskin nasty, go check out David again

    Avatar
    @ Fitz

    Foreskin also allows cumming "handsfree". By docking or doing Kegal while hard (as the glans gets bigger each clinch, it retracts the foreskin a bit each time. This bitty amount of going back ad forth is enough for orgasm. The same amount a guy needs to his place while his woman holds him so tight he can't move is pelvis much. Cut guy have to sometime start over after the lady O's.

    Avatar

    ---The long ago promising, NOW 'on board' Russell Crowe,
    releasing his latest Tavistock Institute apporved --'controversy'.

    Meanwhile NOT A PEEP about the Globalist-RED China TREASON op
    that's swallowing Australia ---or about the unfolding 'EUGENICS
    realism' worldwide.




    You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Sign In or Register