W Magazine Responds to Kontrived Krying of Kim Kardashian

by at .

On this week's episode of Kourtney & Kim Take New York, Kim Kardashian pretended to be upset by last year's naked pictorial in W Magazine.

It was a virtuoso performance, capped by Kim crying that she was misled because the photos were "full-on porn" and then stating: "I'm never taking my clothes off again, even if it's for Vogue." We have three responses:

  1. That sucks for Kris Humphries.
  2. This is an example of Kim Kardashian at her best/most nauseating: posing naked, playing a victim and still managing to shill for a company.
  3. We wonder how many takes it took for Kim to make her tears look believable.
W Magazine Cover

W, meanwhile, had a response of its own. The publication released a statement today that reads as ridiculously as Kim sounds:

"In keeping in line with the theme of W Magazine's November Art Issue, Kim Kardashian's cover was conceived as an artistic collaboration with well-known artist Barbara Kruger, and was a meditation on the influence that reality TV has on contemporary culture.

"The inside portfolio documented the career and power of Kim Kardashian as a work of art, using the language of artists like Jeff Koons ... and Gilbert & George."

An artistic collaboration?!? A meditation on reality TV?!? You photographed Kim Kardashian nude because it would bring a lot of attention to your magazine. Man up. Admit it. Move on.

Tags:

Related Stories

    Comments (9 Total)


    You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Sign In or Register


    Avatar
    Reply
    Monkey

    I wish Karen, I wish! And to HEY: If you like Kim so much, get her blow up doll and it is basically the same thing, you're just not wasting time and money.

    Avatar
    Reply
    Karen

    Well at least Hollywood Gossip calls it like it is -- a blatant lie and bad performance by this aging divorcee. Most of the other sites are giving this lying trash bag the benefit of the doubt, indicating that W broke promises to KK. Puuuhleease, get this whore off the pages and off the TV!!

    Avatar
    Reply
    freespirit114

    Sure, I'll tell you who she is. She's Kim Kardashian, famous for uhhh......being famous and dumb, a legand in her own mind I suppose. The family contributes nothing at all to the world unless you count dropping the I.Q of any room they enter by 30 points or so. For some reason they all seem to think they are important somehow. Have no idea why. And they seem to only be able to function as a unit, I'm pretty sure it's because they share the one working brain cell.

    Avatar
    Reply
    Anichiwavixen

    Would someone please tell me who this dumb bimbo is and exactly what she and her family actually contribute to society.

    Avatar
    Reply
    hey

    lick u ur hott