The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Debate: Playboy vs. Porn!

by at . Comments

We've posted another clip from this week's The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills reunion special and it poses a philosophical question that has been debated by mankind for years:

Which is the more disgraceful act, posing in Playboy or starring in softcore porn?

The issue is raised on the Bravo series because Camille Grammer is asked about the hard time she gave to Faye Resnick a couple months ago. Among other reasons, Grammer said she took issue with Resnick's spread in Hugh Hefner's magazine. This prompts an easy reply from Kyle, as shown below.

Ummm, Camille. What about your adult film career?

Watch the clip and weigh in: Which is more disgraceful, Playboy or porn?

Tags: ,
Avatar

I'm sorry but people in glass whorehouses...yes I'm talking about Camille. Bitch has no room to talk. Just because she hit the lotto when she married Kelsey Grammer doesn't erase the fact that she spread on camera as a career. Money DOESN'T buy class, and porn hos are NOT classy!!

Avatar

Playboy vs porn? There's no comparison, Playboy is so tame, it is even the most mild of all nudey magazines! Hustler or Penthouse are closer to porn, but Playboy? no

Wv peach

I'm so sick of whining Camille. I think taking pix showing your hoo-hoo is gross enough, but the yuck factor for any kind of porn is much worse. She will probably write children's books next. What a whore.

Avatar

Leave Camille alone. The real story is Taylor FAKE "FORD" Armstrong and her loser husband Russell, they have been scaming on rich people for years with her and her name changes, pretending to be a FORD please. They are the Salahis of Beverly Hills!!! Taylor go put you fist in your mouth. You are caught