New Pamela Anderson PETA Ad: Banned in Montreal!

by at .

Finally, someone is taking issue with Pamela Anderson's body.

Tags: ,

From Around the Web

    More From The Hollywood Gossip


    11 Stars Who Went BROKE: Mo' Money, Mo' Problems!

    Having a lot of money doesn't mean stars know what to do with it! Here are 11 stars who went BROKE.

    15 Celebrities Who Are Also Amateur Porn Stars

    If these 15 celebrities, among others, ever need a side job, there's one we know they're capable of. They are also amateur porn stars.

    Pamela Anderson: Nude in Purple Magazine!

    Pamela Anderson goes full-on nude for a new photo shoot with Purple Magazine. Check it out here.

    9 Famous Couples We Can't Believe are Actually Together

    These nine couples are going strong, defying many expectations. We can't believe it.

    16 Comments New Comment Subscribe


    To, Dear Pamela madam....we always appreciate your work... we are running a govt registered trust to help the poor children and animals....somtimes govt will provide some monetary help to us..but most of the time we face difficulties...if you help us by way of donation we shall greatfull to you...please contect me in my


    She certainly doesn't look as if she objects to being sectioned off like cuts of meat. She looks proud of herself. The ad isn't condemning anything. It's just getting off on itself. Again. I'm so sick of PETA's photographs of naked women in chains and cages, and more, and more. It's exactly like soft porn images we've been "exposed" to for years. But, at least they're not on billboards.


    TO Tara-God I thought you people were supppose to be liberals and ase suppose to accept this kind of shit???


    Someone please drop that stupid PETA bimbo and her PETA boss Newkirk into the jungle with crocodile, water buffalo, hippos, lions, leopards, and see how long they survive. How about a new Survivor series with one tribe PETA and the other tribe celebrity hunters like Mr. and Mrs Nugent, Lee and Tiffany, people who join PETA have no clue about mother nature and what cruelty realy is.


    also, this ad did not require her to be naked or in a bikini.
    she could have been fully clothed and it did not require any sexuality in order to get the message across.
    in fact i think it would have been more shocking and effective if they showed her digitally pulled apart into sections or something...they could have been much more creative than this.

    it's just pathetic that the easy go to method is always sexualizing a woman in order to get attention. sure pam chose to do this, but when has pam ever made intelligent decisions? or decisions that empower women? or decisions that didn't play into the stereotype of the sex kitten? it's all about her image and pr, she is a loser who should know her time is up and her fake boobies are old news.


    i dont care if she is wearing a skimpy bikini, she might as well be naked, i mean seriously.

    this is not a 'good cause'...peta is a bunch of lunatics who, as HiltonHater pointed out, could spend their money on saving animals rather than sticking up large billboards of naked/close to naked celebs. there is no way this ad is going to convince people to stop eating meat!!

    perhaps their money might be better spent on education for locals in countries where they hunt endangered species. that i could support.
    THAT would be a 'good cause'.


    TO TARA: One-I am not MALE and two-Pam is CLEARLY not naked!! Pam has been a long time supporter of PETA and this is probably the most conservative pic of her out there plus she is doing for a good cause! No one made a peep about the two naked guys with a naked girl in between them-that was way worse than this one and that picture was never pulled.
    P.S. I would also love to see more naked guys than girls...


    I love steak


    @Tara: You're absolutely right that sex sells and that's where this comes from.
    But that's a VERY different issue than sexism. Sexism implies that one gender is suffering through unfair favoritism being showed to the other. That has nothing at all to do with the ad in question here, or with your overall point of body image.



    yes, it does describe every other billboard. and the lot of them should be taken down, and in their place there should be men in speedos everywhere...

    why is it okay to constantly objectify women? yes that is sexist in my books...women are more than just a body in a bikini, or something to be surgically enhanced for a man's viewing pleasure.

    you are so against it when miley cyrus sets a bad example by wearing things which cover much more of the body than this do you feel about your little sister viewing this billboard and thinking this is the ideal beauty she must strive to achieve? or that her goal in life should be to strip down for men to look at her on a billboard??

    seriously. you are such a HYPOCRITE. you just want to rile people up over issues by saying things this way or that, you have no real opinions. so pathetic.

    You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Sign In or Register