Mercede Johnston Going Rogue with Anti-Palin Blog
Not even 72 hours after reports surfaced about Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston getting back together, his sister Mercede has debuted her official site.
It could draw the wrath of Sarah Palin and brood, too - Mercede Johnston's new blog pledges to "answer all questions related to the Palin family."
One of her claims? Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston planned to conceive Tripp, the 18-month-old son they've spent much of the last year fighting over.
It was widely assumed this was an accident, but "During that time period, she and Levi were sexually active and trying to conceive," Mercede writes.
"As hard as it is for many of you to believe, they were indeed TRYING. Also there were rumors circulating around that she was already pregnant."
Levi and Mercede Johnston in simpler times.
We're not sure what she means by that exactly, but a source close to both Bristol and Levi says that Mercede's shocking claims are totally false.
The source also claimed that Mercede's blog is being backed by well-known Sarah Palin hater, Jesse Griffin of "The Immoral Minority" blog fame.
"Mercede was put up by Jesse Griffin to do this blog," the insider said. "He is a Palin hater and is most likely behind all of these comments."
"Levi would never comment on something like this and neither would Bristol. Mercede's claims have been contradicted by [Levi's] statements."
After an acrimonious and very public break-up, Bristol and Levi have mended their turbulent, icy relationship and recently got back together.
We'll see if that lasts after Mercede apparently decided to turn on them both for reasons unknown. What the heck is wrong with these people?!
Related Posts
- Bristol Palin: Working as Receptionist in Alaska!
- Bristol Palin Reality Show: Scrapped By Bio Channel!
- Happy 21st Birthday, Bristol Palin!
- Levi Johnston on Sarah Palin Presidential Run: Yikes!
September 30th, 2010 6:14 AM
Unbelievable, that' s unerringly what I was seeking because of! You principled saved me alot of work
June 22nd, 2010 6:27 PM
Mercede Johnston claims that her blog isn't Anti Palin yet she answers the most bizarre questions about the family.
If her goal is not to be anti Palin then why did she push rumors about Sarah getting divorced? It's a proven fact that Griffin and Dennis Zaki used Mercede Johnston as a source to push out false rumors about the Palin's as I detailed in my previous post.
You can't blame Palin for accepting the VP nomination she certainly isn't going decline such a nomination because someone who isn't even really related might start feeling uncomfortable when people start sniff out her "PUBLIC" profile for embarrassing photos and comments.
The fact of the matter is that Johnston chose to post pictures up which in result embarrassed the Palin's because blogs were confusing Mercede Johnston with Bristol Palin.
Most of these pictures show Mercede Johnston engaging in underage drinking and kissing a member of the same sex (which I don't take issue with personally but it might
June 21st, 2010 2:21 PM
It looks like someone is scared of the information I am putting out here... Little Miss Johnston has only herself to blame for leaving her dirty tracks behind for others like myself to sniff out.
I want everyone to google her name and look for pictures and then tell me If the Palin's were right to be embarrassed about her antics.
June 21st, 2010 4:40 AM
First off Amanda, Alsaka is not a boring place. And the Palin Myth is easy to start in a place like this because so few people actually live here. SHe couldnt of "happened"in Bakersfield. And Levi was right, she is a liar. How's that? I'm here and its obvious.
June 19th, 2010 5:30 PM
Censorship? She is just banning people from an event it's not like she is putting mouth rags on them. No one's first amendment rights were violated contrary to what you believe.
Like I said before, As a high profile figure she will have a hard time winning a libel case against anyone. Besides I don't think she wanted to indulge the media with a court battle after the FBI spokesman cleared everything up for the sane folks.
It seems like the numbers her press people released weren't accurate but that still doesn't mean the ethics complaints weren't costing the state money and time. It's true that the troop gate incident left her with the most debt since she decided to send the complaint to the ethics board were it belongs. In most cases when someone in AK files an ethics complaint the Governor needs to find a lawyer to defend herself/himself because the AG can't defend him/her because he is considered an enforcer of the ethics act. I am also sure that Palin wanted to draft memos fo
June 19th, 2010 2:24 AM
You're right the first amendment made it possible for Moore to shamelessly promote falsehoods about Palin being investigated by the FBI and I never eluded that fact. However, I did bring up the possibility that Palin could've brought a civil suit for libel against her but it will be tough to win since Palin is a high profile figure.
She's a bully and a coward because she let her husband ban people who used the ethics act as a political tool in order to bankrupt her family?
She's a bully and a coward because she let her husband ban people who promoted falsehoods about her family? (Which I outline in detail in my previous posts)
Private event or not I think any reasonable person can conclude that what she did was justifiable when you consider the past actions of these individuals against her family and administration. Let's just say these folks weren't having a tit for tac on AGIA and leave it at that.
I am aware of the fact that she criticized the president for not accepti
June 19th, 2010 1:45 AM
Davis,
PROVE that Johnston was put up to blog by anti Palin people. Citations, preferably FactCheck, AP, Reuters, PolitiFact or Anchorage Daily News, local Wasilla paper, etc. Palin is the one who called attention to blog in first place, not Johnston. If Palin didn't do her usual schtick, which is whine/play victim in order to keep her name in press, nobody would have known.
Either come heavy or not at all!
June 19th, 2010 12:30 AM
Davis, The only reason I know the setup of home McGinniss is at is because there was an AP article after Palin's claims and had photos showing layout, proving Palin's claims false. Again. Van Flein issued a threat and did not make good on it. Moore simply stood up for herself, saying the First Amendment was created to counter bullies like Palin. It is ILLEGAL to ban ANYONE from state property without either renting it for a private party and agreeing to any and all liabilities that may arise OR if a disturbance happens during event. Palin did change event to private event yet had promoted it as a public event up until the actual event happened. Face facts. She is a bully and coward. She extorted a comic for an apology for a joke yet did nothing for real threats. The whole "threats were online" is a cop-out. Any parent worth a damn would at least make a police report and someone in her shoes would at least inform their security detail. As far as "it is the President's job to know how to
June 18th, 2010 8:48 PM
1: She didn't have to since the FBI spokesman of the state had to release a statement thanks to her crazy antics. She played the victim card after she was promoting the rumor by calling a press conference, In the press conference she was whining about the fact that Palin had the audacity to push back on her false claims via legal methods. She claimed that she was only speculating but as her twitter account reveals she was stating these FBI investigations as pure fact to smear Palin.
2: The owner of the home has the right to do whatever he or she wishes but that doesn't mean McGinniss himself isn't crossing ethical journalistic lines by moving next door to his subject.
3: You seem to know a lot about her house are you stalking her or something? The point that she was making in that post was that the author was invading the families privacy. I never been to the Palin house so I won't know where Piper's room resides at..
4: She may have gone overboard with her reaction but that
June 18th, 2010 4:54 PM
David,
I will make my next point one time and one time only, point by point:
1: Tom Van Flein did threated legal action against Moore. Yet, she NEVER retracted her claims and her did nothing.
2: The owner of home next door SOUGHT McGinniss out. Does she not have private property rights to sell or rent to whomever she wants, provided she does not violate Fair Housing laws and his use does not violate zoning or covenants?
3: The claim by Palin that McGinniss would spy on Piper Palin through window was proven a lie. There is NO 2nd story window on that side of home next door; 2nd story window faces veranda. Furthermore, the "swimming hole" is a PUBLIC lake, not Queen Sarah's feudal pool.
4: McGinniss has never been convicted of ANY crime in ANY court at ANY time; nor has he had any police calls since he got to Wasilla. For Palin to play the "stalker"/"pedophile"/"creepy" card is cynical; gin up her base in hopes harm comes to McGinniss.
5: My point about banning the blo