Umm.. the only reason Gaga's fashion looks like 'art' is because she doesn't have a pretty face, so when she does it, it's 'art.' When Christina does it, it's called 'cheap' because her she's good-looking.. duh.

First of all, anyone who has to sell records by using their looks just shows that they aren't that good. I understand that nowadays it's about both looks and sound but a good singer can sing, you should even have to see them and know they are good. Christina is an example of someone who can sing who never needed to add to her voice by being so showy but that is what she did. As for Gaga, she is a rip off of Madonna. I know because I was a teen when Madonna became famous and I rememeber it well. Nothing Gaga does is original to me since I have seen it all before. Never cared for Madonna all that much but at least she was more original. She DID copy off of Marilyn Monroe though.

Yeah, been saying it for a while that Lady Gaga isn't that original. She's simply a madonna wannabe. Hey I like Gaga's music, but vocally she's no match for Christina but then again, not too many are!!

she is carzy

I'd like to know how someone who has been around LONGER can be copying someone? Hmm? You say Christina is copying Gaga but Christina has been around since I've been ALIVE!! She was on Mickey Mouse Club House and she has been singing her little heart out over since. Lady Gaga is just RECENTLY famous. If you look on the dates of that video Christina's outfits came before Gaga's. And how can you call it copying when someone who was on a hiatus comes back with THEIR styles and THEIR songs. Christina rocked those looks way before Gaga. But yes, Gaga made them way more iconic. I'll give you that much. In my opinion no one is copying anyone. Christina has her syle and Gaga has hers. Yes they might be similar and equaly outlandish but I don't think anyone was intentionally copying anyone.