173 Comments New Comment Subscribe

Avatar

maybe the person doesn't want to comment you,because the site is to comment on the article-or maybe the person commented only once and you got it all wrong getting up in all people's faces-who knows and who cares.

Avatar

So I guess Elizabeth could easily win these cases. The first one is proven by the DNA test on the baby and the marriage license with no divorce. The second by John's statements and the existence of the child, too.

Avatar

Again, my name is Carolee. (The fact you hide behind a different name each time you post is revealing about you.)

You asked me questions and I answered them. I asked you questions and you attack me. Why won't you answer my questions? They aren't difficult, especially since you claim to be Hunter's friend and know all the details.

They are two simple questions in response to your comments:
1. What mean things has Elizabeth said?
2. How is it un-Christian for her to not forgive someone who hasn't apologized and asked for her forgiveness?

Avatar

John should just pay child support,tell the truth,and move on!

Avatar

Who is this 7:23,7:24 person? Ms.know it all? Why is she demanding,picking fights,and so strong willed in her opinion? Guess she has no life.Most people write a comment and get on with their life.

Avatar

Elizabeth is the same as Rielle when it comes to money.Elizabeth is making money capitalizing on the affair in a book-sick! Rielle expects too much in child support-wrong. Elizabeth should not have wriiten a book and Rielle should not get that much child support.

Avatar

Vickie, What is alienation of affection that she can sue for?

Avatar

P.S. Still waiting for you to respond to these questions . . .

What mean things has Elizabeth said? How is it un-Christian for her to not forgive someone who hasn't apologized and asked for her forgiveness?

Avatar

I don't claim Elizabeth's book is the truth but other independent sources have reported confirmation of the first meeting. Hunter herself told a Newsweek reporter some of it.

You are claiming it isn't the truth. If you know that for a fact, then which parts aren't true? Were you there? Or do you say Rielle told you? If the latter, your statements are not necessarily more accurate than Elizabeth's account.

Elizabeth had the contract to write the book before the mess blew up. The publisher said she considered not writing it but ultimately decided to write about the other parts of her life. She only put in the limited comments about the affair because she knew she would be crucified by the press if the wrote the book but never mentioned the affair. If you read it carefully, you'll see she discuss it from the point of view of its impact on her.

Avatar

John should support his child for a reasonable and fair amount of money-it's his daughter!




You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Sign In or Register