Sarah Palin: Newsweek Cover is Sexist! Comments (Page 2)
26 Comments
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 11:26 AM
Explain, you apparently do not know that for one to place the responsiblity of managing an entire nation's health, while he doesn't take care of his own health...Why go there, when I could go on & on about everything else he has attempted to "take care of" and failed,( ie. auto industry, banking industry, etc.).....this is the point, which holds much more water than the idea that a woman in shorts is a "problem"...get it....You probably don't...and this is to be expected, as liberal are completely one-sided...For me to tell you th truth makes me crazy...lol...sorry, all it does is prove your ignorance....
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 11:21 AM
The fact that they show the picture of her, taken in unprofessional garb then state how, professionally, she is a "problem"...and don't know how to "deal" with her...the implications are obvious, why else use a picture taken of her in women's leisure garb and then critisize her professionalism....For you to say there is not a connection between her short shorts and the implication is nonsense and ignorant. Teh fact that she posed for these pictures does not make her a problem...the decision was made in poor choice and used to get attention, using her legs and sexuality to capture the eye in order to spread hate against her...that is just sick....and you are a fool to fall for it.
Explain
November 18th, 2009 11:18 AM
Seriously, can you explain your smoking vs. healthcare point?
Obama thinks poor people should have access to health care. He smokes. I think the latter is a repulsive habit and I wish the POTUS didn't partake in it. But what does that have to do with his belief - shared by a majority of Americans, check any poll you can find - that poor people should have health care coverage?
Troll Alert
November 18th, 2009 10:57 AM
It's so obvious that 'seriously' is a troll. Or writing from a mental institution. Either way, who cares?
Sexist?
November 18th, 2009 10:55 AM
Seriously said: "It is sexist because they took her pic, taken for an article aimed at staying active in the workplace and used it to mock her, in her shorts and casual wear hanging out in the office..."
Huh? How is that "sexist?" i guess Palin fans can take issue with a photo being taken out of context... but SEXIST? She posed for that photo! It just shows her in casual wear.
As Hilton Hater said, the entire point of the article is to be negative toward Palin, so that's no secret. Newsweek changed its business model awhile ago (you can look it up online) to be more opinion-based and this is the opinion it has for its cover story. Palin fans can take issue with it - but how on earth is a picture Palin voluntarily posed for, which just depicts her wearing running clothing, an affront toward women? I'm a woman and I'm not offended.
Hilton Hater Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 10:46 AM
Moreover, the Newsweek story is negative toward Palin. It's not making that a secret.
So Palin has a problem with a photo that paints her in a negative light? That's the entire point of the article! It's an argument against Sarah Palin. Is she gonna make a stink every time a publication paints her in a negative light? As a liberal, allow me to say: God, I hope she does. It's hilarious.
Hilton Hater Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 10:42 AM
I know it was intended for Runner's World. But your argument is as ignorant as Palin's: is she really so naive to think she can control every photograph and every quote she utters? She's a former VP candidate and future Presidential candidate. God forbid a picture is "taken out of context." I'm not even sure what that means. There's a context to posing for a cover photo?
Remember when Fox News claimed Obama and Michelle engaged in a "terrorist fist bump?" Welcome to politics, Palin lovers. This stuff happens ALL the time.
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:33 AM
You idiots are not only "buying up" this shit, along with barely legal Levi's peen patrol, you are nodding at this adminstration as if they are doing a good job. Look inot it....look at what they are doing...
steve
November 18th, 2009 10:32 AM
Hilton are you serious? read the article... It was intended for "runners world" which she was ok with, but when they publish it in on the cover of news week magazine it is taken completely out of context, and is sexist.
Typical uninformed liberal...
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:31 AM
Wake the fuck up you idiots
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:24 AM
The photo was for a fitness magazine you dumbass....it was not for political agenda, study up before you try to make your point...lol...you are an idiot
ddr
November 18th, 2009 10:18 AM
she is a hot ass milf!
i need some conservative mistress punishment!
Xena
November 18th, 2009 9:21 AM
Sarah Palin is an ignoramus. It's really funny that she thinks any intelligent person will buy what she's trying so hard to sell.
Hilton Hater Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 9:06 AM
Just one problem with your take, "seriously." Palin posed for this photo herself! Moreover, she specifically posed for it for a magazine cover shoot.
How, exactly, can she then claim it's sexist?
seriously Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 8:52 AM
WTF....you dumbas liberals really are as stupid as I thought.....where is the uproar? If they had put a pic of Obamawith his kid-fro smoking a cig on the corner stoop...you would be screaming racist.....typical double standard hypocrites.
Evan
November 18th, 2009 8:50 AM
She's introducing her new line of dolls: Psycho Barbie.
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 11:26 AM
Explain, you apparently do not know that for one to place the responsiblity of managing an entire nation's health, while he doesn't take care of his own health...Why go there, when I could go on & on about everything else he has attempted to "take care of" and failed,( ie. auto industry, banking industry, etc.).....this is the point, which holds much more water than the idea that a woman in shorts is a "problem"...get it....You probably don't...and this is to be expected, as liberal are completely one-sided...For me to tell you th truth makes me crazy...lol...sorry, all it does is prove your ignorance....
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 11:21 AM
The fact that they show the picture of her, taken in unprofessional garb then state how, professionally, she is a "problem"...and don't know how to "deal" with her...the implications are obvious, why else use a picture taken of her in women's leisure garb and then critisize her professionalism....For you to say there is not a connection between her short shorts and the implication is nonsense and ignorant. Teh fact that she posed for these pictures does not make her a problem...the decision was made in poor choice and used to get attention, using her legs and sexuality to capture the eye in order to spread hate against her...that is just sick....and you are a fool to fall for it.
November 18th, 2009 11:18 AM
Seriously, can you explain your smoking vs. healthcare point?
Obama thinks poor people should have access to health care. He smokes. I think the latter is a repulsive habit and I wish the POTUS didn't partake in it. But what does that have to do with his belief - shared by a majority of Americans, check any poll you can find - that poor people should have health care coverage?
November 18th, 2009 10:57 AM
It's so obvious that 'seriously' is a troll. Or writing from a mental institution. Either way, who cares?
November 18th, 2009 10:55 AM
Seriously said: "It is sexist because they took her pic, taken for an article aimed at staying active in the workplace and used it to mock her, in her shorts and casual wear hanging out in the office..."
Huh? How is that "sexist?" i guess Palin fans can take issue with a photo being taken out of context... but SEXIST? She posed for that photo! It just shows her in casual wear.
As Hilton Hater said, the entire point of the article is to be negative toward Palin, so that's no secret. Newsweek changed its business model awhile ago (you can look it up online) to be more opinion-based and this is the opinion it has for its cover story. Palin fans can take issue with it - but how on earth is a picture Palin voluntarily posed for, which just depicts her wearing running clothing, an affront toward women? I'm a woman and I'm not offended.
Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 10:46 AM
Moreover, the Newsweek story is negative toward Palin. It's not making that a secret.
So Palin has a problem with a photo that paints her in a negative light? That's the entire point of the article! It's an argument against Sarah Palin. Is she gonna make a stink every time a publication paints her in a negative light? As a liberal, allow me to say: God, I hope she does. It's hilarious.
Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 10:42 AM
I know it was intended for Runner's World. But your argument is as ignorant as Palin's: is she really so naive to think she can control every photograph and every quote she utters? She's a former VP candidate and future Presidential candidate. God forbid a picture is "taken out of context." I'm not even sure what that means. There's a context to posing for a cover photo?
Remember when Fox News claimed Obama and Michelle engaged in a "terrorist fist bump?" Welcome to politics, Palin lovers. This stuff happens ALL the time.
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:33 AM
You idiots are not only "buying up" this shit, along with barely legal Levi's peen patrol, you are nodding at this adminstration as if they are doing a good job. Look inot it....look at what they are doing...
November 18th, 2009 10:32 AM
Hilton are you serious? read the article... It was intended for "runners world" which she was ok with, but when they publish it in on the cover of news week magazine it is taken completely out of context, and is sexist.
Typical uninformed liberal...
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:31 AM
Wake the fuck up you idiots
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 10:24 AM
The photo was for a fitness magazine you dumbass....it was not for political agenda, study up before you try to make your point...lol...you are an idiot
November 18th, 2009 10:18 AM
she is a hot ass milf!
i need some conservative mistress punishment!
November 18th, 2009 9:21 AM
Sarah Palin is an ignoramus. It's really funny that she thinks any intelligent person will buy what she's trying so hard to sell.
Rank: Staff Member
November 18th, 2009 9:06 AM
Just one problem with your take, "seriously." Palin posed for this photo herself! Moreover, she specifically posed for it for a magazine cover shoot.
How, exactly, can she then claim it's sexist?
Rank: D-Lister
November 18th, 2009 8:52 AM
WTF....you dumbas liberals really are as stupid as I thought.....where is the uproar? If they had put a pic of Obamawith his kid-fro smoking a cig on the corner stoop...you would be screaming racist.....typical double standard hypocrites.
November 18th, 2009 8:50 AM
She's introducing her new line of dolls: Psycho Barbie.