Megan Fox has shouted it for months: I am not Angelina Jolie!
That might be the case, but a new report that states the actresses are pitted against each other for the lead role in Barbarella, the remake of a 1968 film, won't do much to dispel the comparisons between these beauties.
"This will be the first time Ange and Megan have ever faced off for the same role," a source told MSN in Canada. "Ange is really feeling the pressure. Ange knows that to win roles she has to look youthful."
It probably doesn't help Jolie's focus that her private life in reportedly in shambles. A totally unreliable tabloids claims Brangelina has separated.
While fans can compare the sexy stars below, there's little doubt Fox is on a hot streak these days. She's starring in a much-publicized movie that opens on September 18 (Jennifer's Body) and she's hosting the 35th season premiere of Saturday Night Live.
No wonder an insider said that "Megan is stunning and fast becoming a huge star. Angelina is petrified."
Should she be? Who would you choose to rail between this pair of actresses?
Share
23 Comments
September 11th, 2009 9:01 AM
> they are b0th beautiful and sexy.. T_T
September 11th, 2009 9:35 AM
Ya, okay. Angelina, the hottest, most powerful, influential, richest star in the world is petrified of an unproven flash in the pan actress? Sounds right. The only thing Ms. Fox has on Jolie is youth, which doesn't mean anything. Being younger doesnt make you hotter, case in point. Angie's skin looks like a 20 year olds...flawless. Something tells me Megan won't look as great at 34 or age as gracefully. The tell tale signs are there. Terrible skin, caked on makeup. Fox is pretty, she's just no Angelina. Talent wise? No contest. Until Megan wins an acting award, (as Jolie did at her age for Gia, prob. would have won an Oscar if it were on the big screen) Then we can talk. JMO.
September 11th, 2009 12:21 PM
Angie petrified from who?!!! Fox is pretty but Angelina is an other world! Angelina is on the top for everything: incredible beauty, (yes her skin look like at 20 years old) awards winner, humanitarian helps and she still don't act like a diva.At the moment I don't see so much talent in Megan Fox we only hope she don't become the future "Lindsay Lohan" thinking to be a diva don't bring anywhere.
September 11th, 2009 3:45 PM
I seriously doubt this made up story. Angelina, probably does not even know who Megan Fox is.
September 11th, 2009 7:06 PM
anna - megan will look a lot better than jolie at her age! she hasn't been addict to heroin, slept around with married man - not talking about pitt - cage and hutton and been known as the town pump- wore blood around her neck like jolie was doing at HER age! Megan is beautiful and talented! you can like jolie without trying to degrade another being compare to jolie - jolie hasn't always been the person she is today!!! let's hope her heart is right and not for selfish motives! julie - you don't see the talent out of fear for jolie? megan already made several movies that have been number 1 at the box office! brangelinas can't be happy for anyone when it comes to comparing them to jolie! lol.
September 11th, 2009 7:37 PM
Jolie is too old for this role. Young dudes like young girls, and young dudes are the target audience for this movie. Show me a 21-year-old male who would rather look at Jolie than Fox, and I'll show you a guy with a mommie complex. What Fox will look like in ten years is moot. What matters is right now, and right now she looks like Jolie's daughter.
September 12th, 2009 4:37 AM
I don't believe believe one bit this news. It's just created gossip.
September 12th, 2009 8:01 PM
Silly Sally, its obvious you have this personal vendetta against Angelina, so all your comments are moot. You need to stop living in AJ's past, its 2009... If it were Susan Boyle they were comparing AJ with, you would think Boyle was hotter and looked younger, lol. You're blinded by so much hate you can't see straight. Take it easy. How can you really know Meghan will look better? Being in the beauty business, its well known that having great skin is a precursor to how you'll age. Hate on Jolie all you want, you cant deny the woman has great skin. Lets be real here. As far as your comment about degrading Megan...Um, you need to listen to yourself. I simply said Jolie was hotter and had better skin, nothing degrading about that. YOU found the need to attack Jolie viciously. Hypocrisy at its finest...I'm not even gonna comment on your take on Jolies talent and Megans lack thereof. Just a stupid and reaching comment. FYI, Transformers is not a movie where acting chops were tested. Your idol Meghan stated that herself.
September 13th, 2009 5:43 AM
anna look j is ok but she also put makeup on her body,1 she became so hot for she does off set and on set she'll fuck you and any one she like's on set or off set so here skill aint that great as will as fox ok so stop and get a grip she aint that great but fox is better for the role she's younger. joile someting about her doing the part wont be good like tome raider and other movie's that didn't do to well that she stared in
September 13th, 2009 8:29 AM
To Jack, most women wear makeup. Theres a diiference between lots of it (Think Pamela Anderson, Megan) and just enough, Jolie. Thats all i could really gather from your post, fortunately. Next time try using periods so we know where the sentences start and end..., I also have to agree with Anna. Jolie is way, way more beautiful and talented, even at her tender age of 34. Seems pretty obvious to me.