Peter King: Michael Jackson is a Pedophile, Child Molester Comments (Page 8)
172 Comments
Troy
July 6th, 2009 2:00 PM
The world as we know it is deviant. God help us all when it's okay for innoecent children to be molested, ravaged, and ruined. How sad our fate! Mark my words, God is not nodding off - He is paying very close attention.
Tim
July 6th, 2009 1:59 PM
hampshire: You don't think the legal system is seriously flawed? You honestly think that we have such a high rate of accuracy in jury trials that we should take a conviction or lack of as the equivalent to their innocence or guilt? I'd cite the obvious examples, but other posters have already done so for me.
As for "no man" equaling MJ in terms of his charity, that's just factually wrong. $350m donated, if that's the amount, is very impressive, but many have donated more because they have greater means. Anyway, suggesting that someone donating money for the betterment of others must be a "good person" at heart is insane oversimplification. People are a lot more complicated than the characters you see on TV. Everyone's got good and evil in them, and they don't necessarily have to conflict. Someone can be sexually or emotionally attracted to children and still be very generous. Many pedophiles honestly believe that they are not doing anything wrong, or even that they are prote
January
July 6th, 2009 1:57 PM
Has anyone read all the accounts of young boys being fondled, "licked on the head", embraced, masturbated, etc. by the "King of Pop"?! It's horrifying. MJ actually begged a mother to let her boy sleep in his bed. MJ was sobbing, shaking, and trembling because the parents would not let it happen. WOULD YOU HAVE LET YOUR SON SLEEP IN MICHAEL JACKSON'S BED? If so, you should've been shot, pervert!
Dave
July 6th, 2009 1:34 PM
Lets apply some poster's logic to some other court cases
If OJ & the LA cops were guilty, they would have been convicted and not acquitted. If you think they're still guilty, then the entire American legal system is seriously flawed.
So if he was not guilty and nothing to fear from a court case why'd he pay the $$$ and praising someone for looking after his legal kids, it's called doing what has to be done in the first place. Hey someone praise me, I didn't rob a bank today!
Janice Marie
July 6th, 2009 1:30 PM
While I believe that you are innocent until proven guilty (and I believe Michael Jackson wouldn't hurt a fly, let alone a child), please remember that O.J. was acquitted as well, so the legal system is VERY flawed.
That being said, the man gave his all entertaining the masses and helped countless charities.
May he Rest in Peace.
Troy
July 6th, 2009 1:23 PM
PETER KING: YOU ARE A HERO! THANK YOU for saying what no other elected official has the balls to say - Michael Jackson, though he could sing and dance like noone else, was a CHILD MOLESTER, a PEDOPHILE! He was a very sick, perverted thing.
Jake
July 6th, 2009 12:40 PM
Congressman? May God help us all!
hampshire
July 6th, 2009 12:17 PM
America is indeed in a sorry state to have congressman like Peter King and bloggers who concur with him. First, seek to understand before passing judgement. Second, before passing judgement, know that you are also wearing tainted glasses. If Michael was guilty, he would have been convicted and not acquitted. If you think he is still guilty, then the entire American legal system is seriously flawed. No man has equalled Michael in his generosity to charity and humanity. A person without pure heart will never be able to contribute $350m to charity and will 40% of his assets to children who may plausibly not be his.
Truth Hurts
July 6th, 2009 11:59 AM
Michael Jackson was found not guilty because "the evidence wasnt there" it wasnt there because he paid his accuse a settlement. That is just downright shady and disgusting. I agree with Peter King is lifestyle should overshadow any so called "talent" he had.
He is a drug addicted, pervert and he is dead. The End
zena
July 6th, 2009 11:47 AM
i agree with peter king soooo much !
so many people hated him while he was alive but pretend to worship him now.
get a grip.
peter king is right- why aren't the REAL heroes of the world being praised instead of a guy who, a few short weeks ago, was the butt of everyone's jokes ?
the same things happened when jade goody died and i am so sick of this whole "they are dead, we must love them" thing.
Truth
July 6th, 2009 11:38 AM
This guy needs to STFU. He is talking about people doing work in AIDS facilities etc. does this jackass not realize that Michael donated over 350 million dollars of his money to help these places out? Just another loser looking for some attention from the media.
doubtful
July 6th, 2009 11:31 AM
If I call Rep. King a ‘low-life’ and a ‘pervert’, that means it is true?
Jackson was acquitted of all charges.
The presumption of innocence is still a legal right in US. Or am I wrong?
July 6th, 2009 2:00 PM
The world as we know it is deviant. God help us all when it's okay for innoecent children to be molested, ravaged, and ruined. How sad our fate! Mark my words, God is not nodding off - He is paying very close attention.
July 6th, 2009 1:59 PM
hampshire: You don't think the legal system is seriously flawed? You honestly think that we have such a high rate of accuracy in jury trials that we should take a conviction or lack of as the equivalent to their innocence or guilt? I'd cite the obvious examples, but other posters have already done so for me.
As for "no man" equaling MJ in terms of his charity, that's just factually wrong. $350m donated, if that's the amount, is very impressive, but many have donated more because they have greater means. Anyway, suggesting that someone donating money for the betterment of others must be a "good person" at heart is insane oversimplification. People are a lot more complicated than the characters you see on TV. Everyone's got good and evil in them, and they don't necessarily have to conflict. Someone can be sexually or emotionally attracted to children and still be very generous. Many pedophiles honestly believe that they are not doing anything wrong, or even that they are prote
July 6th, 2009 1:57 PM
Has anyone read all the accounts of young boys being fondled, "licked on the head", embraced, masturbated, etc. by the "King of Pop"?! It's horrifying. MJ actually begged a mother to let her boy sleep in his bed. MJ was sobbing, shaking, and trembling because the parents would not let it happen. WOULD YOU HAVE LET YOUR SON SLEEP IN MICHAEL JACKSON'S BED? If so, you should've been shot, pervert!
July 6th, 2009 1:34 PM
Lets apply some poster's logic to some other court cases
If OJ & the LA cops were guilty, they would have been convicted and not acquitted. If you think they're still guilty, then the entire American legal system is seriously flawed.
So if he was not guilty and nothing to fear from a court case why'd he pay the $$$ and praising someone for looking after his legal kids, it's called doing what has to be done in the first place. Hey someone praise me, I didn't rob a bank today!
July 6th, 2009 1:30 PM
While I believe that you are innocent until proven guilty (and I believe Michael Jackson wouldn't hurt a fly, let alone a child), please remember that O.J. was acquitted as well, so the legal system is VERY flawed.
That being said, the man gave his all entertaining the masses and helped countless charities.
May he Rest in Peace.
July 6th, 2009 1:23 PM
PETER KING: YOU ARE A HERO! THANK YOU for saying what no other elected official has the balls to say - Michael Jackson, though he could sing and dance like noone else, was a CHILD MOLESTER, a PEDOPHILE! He was a very sick, perverted thing.
July 6th, 2009 12:40 PM
Congressman? May God help us all!
July 6th, 2009 12:17 PM
America is indeed in a sorry state to have congressman like Peter King and bloggers who concur with him. First, seek to understand before passing judgement. Second, before passing judgement, know that you are also wearing tainted glasses. If Michael was guilty, he would have been convicted and not acquitted. If you think he is still guilty, then the entire American legal system is seriously flawed. No man has equalled Michael in his generosity to charity and humanity. A person without pure heart will never be able to contribute $350m to charity and will 40% of his assets to children who may plausibly not be his.
July 6th, 2009 11:59 AM
Michael Jackson was found not guilty because "the evidence wasnt there" it wasnt there because he paid his accuse a settlement. That is just downright shady and disgusting. I agree with Peter King is lifestyle should overshadow any so called "talent" he had.
He is a drug addicted, pervert and he is dead. The End
July 6th, 2009 11:47 AM
i agree with peter king soooo much !
so many people hated him while he was alive but pretend to worship him now.
get a grip.
peter king is right- why aren't the REAL heroes of the world being praised instead of a guy who, a few short weeks ago, was the butt of everyone's jokes ?
the same things happened when jade goody died and i am so sick of this whole "they are dead, we must love them" thing.
July 6th, 2009 11:38 AM
This guy needs to STFU. He is talking about people doing work in AIDS facilities etc. does this jackass not realize that Michael donated over 350 million dollars of his money to help these places out? Just another loser looking for some attention from the media.
July 6th, 2009 11:31 AM
If I call Rep. King a ‘low-life’ and a ‘pervert’, that means it is true?
Jackson was acquitted of all charges.
The presumption of innocence is still a legal right in US. Or am I wrong?