Howard Stern to Letterman: Jay Leno Sucks Comments (Page 2)
21 Comments
Terminator X
November 11th, 2009 7:39 PM
Hahaha, I clicked on this link after typing "why Jay Leno sucks" into the Google search engine and suddenly seem to have come across some right-wing whackjob comment board. I haven't really watched Letterman in years and never really paid that much attention to Stern, but I'd agree with the previous poster that they're both "of the subculture genre." That's precisely why they're better than Leno. While Jay doses out humor that's the equivalent of milk-soaked white bread washed down with a glass of Ovaltine/Metamucil, Letterman and Stern still have the ability to rile people up, no matter how much edge either of them has lost over the years. For a comedian, if you're not at least making a half-hearted attempt to provoke people into some higher-level thinking, you're really just telling knock-knock jokes to a bunch of mouth breathers. Kinda like Leno.
shirley lewis
October 27th, 2009 10:22 PM
You are still the biggest fake show talk host!!!!!!!!!!! Your jokes are as funny as my grandfathers' death!!!!!!!!!! Hang up you wanna be , you should not let Conan the barbaric boy, take after you, then show up later with another talk show before conan. what happened? you got your white tighties in a bunch?
Sean
October 20th, 2009 2:07 AM
Let's examine these three men: Letterman, Stern and Leno. They're all terribly ugly old men who never mastered the art of adulthood. Old men in old men's bodies acting like spoiled, pretentious 15 year olds; they're offensive (particularly Stern and Letterman); they're all arrogant and self centered, and about as entertaining as a dustmite. Most of the people who support these late night cretinous motormouths are individuals of the subculture genre. I can't think of any respectable individuals who admires garbage like Howard Stern. Well, it takes all kinds. Just look at the condition of television nowadays; there's nothing worth watching unless you enjoy a supercharged does of stupidity that the networks are happily churning out. I'll be happy when Leno's television exposure expires (hopefully very soon) and jerkoff Letterman and Stern decide to throw in the towel. That's not to say that some younger cretinous moron will be their successor. Yeeeech.....
Les Grossman
September 16th, 2009 6:50 PM
Here we are, months later, and Jay Leno has premiered his new show. His new show is the same as his previous barely-funny show. You see, he does suck; he can't even do anything different besides the same lame-ass shit that has been on multiple late night shows since the 70's. So, turns out, Stern was right.
LOUDMIKE
September 15th, 2009 1:00 PM
Stern's show is still hilarious.
Mark
June 16th, 2009 12:07 PM
Well, Dave has an edge that Jon Stewart has copied and he's been on tv like forever and till rocks it. While Leno is a mainstream comedian, everyone loves mainstream that's why it's mainstream. Dave is intellektual and ironic, that's original.
Lena
June 16th, 2009 12:05 PM
I love David, he is the king okay.. A joke is a joke dammit.
bababooey
June 15th, 2009 6:06 PM
Letterman is becoming a has been. Both he and Stern have lost the edge over the years. They are both a couple of liberals now marching the party line. Letterman has to resort to making fun of Palin's 14 year old daughter's then expect us to believe he was talking about the 18 year old who wasn't there. He shouldn't be making fun of kids anyway. Oh wait, it's ok if it's a Conservative. I've watched my last Letterman show and I'm making sure CBS and the advertisers know it.
Jimmie
June 14th, 2009 7:07 PM
Howard Stern is Has-Been Loser. Who cares what he thinks? Even Lame-oid Letterman has more viewers than Stern has listeners.
bill
June 12th, 2009 10:20 AM
Letterman sucks He should make fun of his own bastard children
Rhonda Stovey
June 11th, 2009 1:19 PM
Howard and Letterman are always a home run. Long live the King of all Media!
November 11th, 2009 7:39 PM
Hahaha, I clicked on this link after typing "why Jay Leno sucks" into the Google search engine and suddenly seem to have come across some right-wing whackjob comment board. I haven't really watched Letterman in years and never really paid that much attention to Stern, but I'd agree with the previous poster that they're both "of the subculture genre." That's precisely why they're better than Leno. While Jay doses out humor that's the equivalent of milk-soaked white bread washed down with a glass of Ovaltine/Metamucil, Letterman and Stern still have the ability to rile people up, no matter how much edge either of them has lost over the years. For a comedian, if you're not at least making a half-hearted attempt to provoke people into some higher-level thinking, you're really just telling knock-knock jokes to a bunch of mouth breathers. Kinda like Leno.
October 27th, 2009 10:22 PM
You are still the biggest fake show talk host!!!!!!!!!!! Your jokes are as funny as my grandfathers' death!!!!!!!!!! Hang up you wanna be , you should not let Conan the barbaric boy, take after you, then show up later with another talk show before conan. what happened? you got your white tighties in a bunch?
October 20th, 2009 2:07 AM
Let's examine these three men: Letterman, Stern and Leno. They're all terribly ugly old men who never mastered the art of adulthood. Old men in old men's bodies acting like spoiled, pretentious 15 year olds; they're offensive (particularly Stern and Letterman); they're all arrogant and self centered, and about as entertaining as a dustmite. Most of the people who support these late night cretinous motormouths are individuals of the subculture genre. I can't think of any respectable individuals who admires garbage like Howard Stern. Well, it takes all kinds. Just look at the condition of television nowadays; there's nothing worth watching unless you enjoy a supercharged does of stupidity that the networks are happily churning out. I'll be happy when Leno's television exposure expires (hopefully very soon) and jerkoff Letterman and Stern decide to throw in the towel. That's not to say that some younger cretinous moron will be their successor. Yeeeech.....
September 16th, 2009 6:50 PM
Here we are, months later, and Jay Leno has premiered his new show. His new show is the same as his previous barely-funny show. You see, he does suck; he can't even do anything different besides the same lame-ass shit that has been on multiple late night shows since the 70's. So, turns out, Stern was right.
September 15th, 2009 1:00 PM
Stern's show is still hilarious.
June 16th, 2009 12:07 PM
Well, Dave has an edge that Jon Stewart has copied and he's been on tv like forever and till rocks it. While Leno is a mainstream comedian, everyone loves mainstream that's why it's mainstream. Dave is intellektual and ironic, that's original.
June 16th, 2009 12:05 PM
I love David, he is the king okay.. A joke is a joke dammit.
June 15th, 2009 6:06 PM
Letterman is becoming a has been. Both he and Stern have lost the edge over the years. They are both a couple of liberals now marching the party line. Letterman has to resort to making fun of Palin's 14 year old daughter's then expect us to believe he was talking about the 18 year old who wasn't there. He shouldn't be making fun of kids anyway. Oh wait, it's ok if it's a Conservative. I've watched my last Letterman show and I'm making sure CBS and the advertisers know it.
June 14th, 2009 7:07 PM
Howard Stern is Has-Been Loser. Who cares what he thinks? Even Lame-oid Letterman has more viewers than Stern has listeners.
June 12th, 2009 10:20 AM
Letterman sucks He should make fun of his own bastard children
June 11th, 2009 1:19 PM
Howard and Letterman are always a home run. Long live the King of all Media!