Debbie Rowe to Take Custody of Michael Jackson's Children Comments (Page 2)
24 Comments
rose
July 8th, 2009 8:18 PM
no debbie rowe should not get the children. she gave them up one time.paris broke my heart she needs her family.as knows.
rose
July 8th, 2009 8:13 PM
i do not think she should get them back. because she took money for them.after seeing. Paris,saying what she did broke my heart
shelly
July 2nd, 2009 8:48 PM
Debbie is the best mother for these children period!!!!!!
shelly
July 2nd, 2009 8:46 PM
Debbie Rowe would definitely be the best Mother for these children. She has tried to be in their lives in the past but due to overwhelming circumstances which we are now experiencing have made it impossible. Now she can, and will gain custody of these childresn and will be the best thing that ever happeded to these children. Case Closed!!!!!
Clint
July 1st, 2009 8:20 AM
That debbie is so ugly,, I thought michael would have some kind of hot wife.
Paula
June 30th, 2009 10:41 AM
I think the children would be better with the Mother.
After all what kind of life did Michael have with his parents
Looks like his father is seeing $. His speech on TV was to promote his new business, not the death of his son.
Helen Homer
June 29th, 2009 8:46 AM
Regardless of the "world's'opinions(and everynoe has one even though 'opinions'which are nothing but 'judgements in truth,a child/ and or children should always be with their mother.People seem to choose or forget the immense connection and influence a mother has on her children> I am a mother and I know that while they may have been seperated from her for a length of time, either way you view/judge it SHE is thier mother and he CHOSE her to be that.As for child number 3, 'Blanket'< I pity, wonder and can only hope his best interests are at the heart of everyone> Maybe if Michael Jackson had revealed his birth mother's identity, ratger than hide and control his children's lives through money, maybe the 3 children have a chance to share time together and grow up with some type of real and true connection. To blame Debbie Rowe is a clear scapegoat to his own loyalty and love to and for his children to know, understand and feeel connected to their oroginal orogins> I grew up with parents
JMatt
June 28th, 2009 5:18 PM
The kids should be returned to their mother - it is outrageous that MJ ensured she never saw them. Everyone has the right to see BOTH their parents. Being the child of a celebrity is irrelevant.
Me
June 28th, 2009 1:11 AM
God Bless Michael Jackson, he was a truly remarkable beautiful man. His past mis dealings should not be brought up, people are only bringing them up to make him look bad. THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. In 5 years people will forget all those stupid criticizing people, but they will not forget Michael Jackson or his awesome songs. Rest In Paradise Michael you truly will be missed. As for the mother of these 2 children, she has no right to have them. It's obvious that Michael and her did not marry out of love so therefore she doesn't deserve such beautiful children. Let them stay with their Jackson family
vmatt
June 27th, 2009 7:21 PM
I don't think Debbie will get custody considering the kids age... the 2 kids in question are 11 and 12 and definitely old enough to have a say as to where they want to live... with grandma or with a total stranger who sold them for cash. They will chose grandma.
VERONICA
June 27th, 2009 3:18 AM
DEBBIE is a stupid bitch and she does not need too be in kids life she gave up on them once and she ll do it again that s just who she is and now that he is gone she will go after the kids just cause of the money. i just hope that Jackson s family do whatever it takes to protect them kids from a mother like Debbie.just too be in Michael life is a blessing but too have kids by Michael is every girl dream come true.Michael deserved much more and much better than her he was a star that s something she ll never be but i guess people do not know what they have til its gone.i am so hurt because Michael is no longer with us but his music and just the way he was and things he did will go on for ever. when Michael died part of my heart goes with him and the other part goes out too his family and his kids.MICHAEL REST IN PEACE AND I LL ALWAYS KEEP YOU AND YOUR KIDS IN MY PRAYERS AS FOR THE JACKSON S KEEP YOUR EYES OPEN PROTECT THEM KIDS AND GOD BLESS YOU. VERONICA , ROCKFORD IL.
Nikki
June 26th, 2009 8:46 PM
I don't think she should have any rights to those children. She gave them up and they don't even know her - I think it would be dreadful if they were handed to her. I also think they should be kept together. The only world they knew was with their father and they are going to be totally traumatized after his death - they should certainly not be separated and they should stay with his family. I saw transcripts from the agreement they made regarding the children and Michael already had someone in mind to take care of them if anything should ever happen to him. She said so herself. I hope she doesn't get them
Sara
June 26th, 2009 7:02 PM
O no, pls dont split up the kids. Let them all stay together. I think its best that they stay with their grandmother. Does Debbie even have relationship at all with them?
Debbie Ooooo
June 26th, 2009 2:12 PM
that debbie really cleaned up financially with michael. she never has to worry about money. and the jackson family is going to be so angry because it was reported that debbie couldn't stand them therefore they can expect to get no kind of financial support from her. i hope she repairs neverland and makes it another graceland. debbie be good to those kids.
July 8th, 2009 8:18 PM
no debbie rowe should not get the children. she gave them up one time.paris broke my heart she needs her family.as knows.
July 8th, 2009 8:13 PM
i do not think she should get them back. because she took money for them.after seeing. Paris,saying what she did broke my heart
July 2nd, 2009 8:48 PM
Debbie is the best mother for these children period!!!!!!
July 2nd, 2009 8:46 PM
Debbie Rowe would definitely be the best Mother for these children. She has tried to be in their lives in the past but due to overwhelming circumstances which we are now experiencing have made it impossible. Now she can, and will gain custody of these childresn and will be the best thing that ever happeded to these children. Case Closed!!!!!
July 1st, 2009 8:20 AM
That debbie is so ugly,, I thought michael would have some kind of hot wife.
June 30th, 2009 10:41 AM
I think the children would be better with the Mother.
After all what kind of life did Michael have with his parents
Looks like his father is seeing $. His speech on TV was to promote his new business, not the death of his son.
June 29th, 2009 8:46 AM
Regardless of the "world's'opinions(and everynoe has one even though 'opinions'which are nothing but 'judgements in truth,a child/ and or children should always be with their mother.People seem to choose or forget the immense connection and influence a mother has on her children> I am a mother and I know that while they may have been seperated from her for a length of time, either way you view/judge it SHE is thier mother and he CHOSE her to be that.As for child number 3, 'Blanket'< I pity, wonder and can only hope his best interests are at the heart of everyone> Maybe if Michael Jackson had revealed his birth mother's identity, ratger than hide and control his children's lives through money, maybe the 3 children have a chance to share time together and grow up with some type of real and true connection. To blame Debbie Rowe is a clear scapegoat to his own loyalty and love to and for his children to know, understand and feeel connected to their oroginal orogins> I grew up with parents
June 28th, 2009 5:18 PM
The kids should be returned to their mother - it is outrageous that MJ ensured she never saw them. Everyone has the right to see BOTH their parents. Being the child of a celebrity is irrelevant.
June 28th, 2009 1:11 AM
God Bless Michael Jackson, he was a truly remarkable beautiful man. His past mis dealings should not be brought up, people are only bringing them up to make him look bad. THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. In 5 years people will forget all those stupid criticizing people, but they will not forget Michael Jackson or his awesome songs. Rest In Paradise Michael you truly will be missed. As for the mother of these 2 children, she has no right to have them. It's obvious that Michael and her did not marry out of love so therefore she doesn't deserve such beautiful children. Let them stay with their Jackson family
June 27th, 2009 7:21 PM
I don't think Debbie will get custody considering the kids age... the 2 kids in question are 11 and 12 and definitely old enough to have a say as to where they want to live... with grandma or with a total stranger who sold them for cash. They will chose grandma.
June 27th, 2009 3:18 AM
DEBBIE is a stupid bitch and she does not need too be in kids life she gave up on them once and she ll do it again that s just who she is and now that he is gone she will go after the kids just cause of the money. i just hope that Jackson s family do whatever it takes to protect them kids from a mother like Debbie.just too be in Michael life is a blessing but too have kids by Michael is every girl dream come true.Michael deserved much more and much better than her he was a star that s something she ll never be but i guess people do not know what they have til its gone.i am so hurt because Michael is no longer with us but his music and just the way he was and things he did will go on for ever. when Michael died part of my heart goes with him and the other part goes out too his family and his kids.MICHAEL REST IN PEACE AND I LL ALWAYS KEEP YOU AND YOUR KIDS IN MY PRAYERS AS FOR THE JACKSON S KEEP YOUR EYES OPEN PROTECT THEM KIDS AND GOD BLESS YOU. VERONICA , ROCKFORD IL.
June 26th, 2009 8:46 PM
I don't think she should have any rights to those children. She gave them up and they don't even know her - I think it would be dreadful if they were handed to her. I also think they should be kept together. The only world they knew was with their father and they are going to be totally traumatized after his death - they should certainly not be separated and they should stay with his family. I saw transcripts from the agreement they made regarding the children and Michael already had someone in mind to take care of them if anything should ever happen to him. She said so herself. I hope she doesn't get them
June 26th, 2009 7:02 PM
O no, pls dont split up the kids. Let them all stay together. I think its best that they stay with their grandmother. Does Debbie even have relationship at all with them?
June 26th, 2009 2:12 PM
that debbie really cleaned up financially with michael. she never has to worry about money. and the jackson family is going to be so angry because it was reported that debbie couldn't stand them therefore they can expect to get no kind of financial support from her. i hope she repairs neverland and makes it another graceland. debbie be good to those kids.