Arnold Klein: Biological Father of Michael Jackson's Children Comments (Page 4)
96 Comments
In God We Trust
July 9th, 2009 1:08 AM
I believe since Michael Jackson never legally adopted his children, though he assumed the role as a guardian/father to them, it is morally imperative that these children know who their real parents are because it has been psychologically damaging to these children with such a disjointed upbringing regardless of how "kind" Michael Jackson may have been to them. There are way too many "selfish egos" involved in this whole scenario that are interfering with the harsh reality of fractured children. These are "children" not "toys" and they need to feel secure emotionally. It's not even a matter of who gets custody at this point, but rather who will be the person or persons to give them emotional stability and security in knowing who they are as human beings and their lineage. There may be medical issues in the future that biological information will prove vital to these childrens' physical and emotional well being. If Dr. Arnold Klein is the parent (no matter if he has a gay partner), thi
Jenn
July 7th, 2009 8:31 PM
If he is or is not their biological father he is their father in all the ways that matter. My goodness even in his tragic death the media still hounds him and can not leave him alone. Is it any wonder he felt the way he did about himself. I think in many ways the media killed this beautiful soul who will be forever missed. And if these children are removed from the family they have always known the Jackson family there is no justice in this world. God Bless you Michael and your children and family. I hope you find peace where you are now and see how much you are loved!!!!
Tod
July 7th, 2009 7:38 PM
Michael Jackson is a sick person. He brought these poor children into this world and they're not even his. You all can say it doesn't matter, but don't kid yourselves cause it does.
Becky
July 7th, 2009 6:05 PM
Michael Jackson raised these children and he is their father no matter how many DNA tests someone takes. He has taken care of them financially, emotionally, and loved these children which means he is the Dad and only parent the children have ever known. People should leave Michael Jackson's children and family alone. (Example: Say a person adopts a child and then this person passes away should the birth parents have the right to get them back. NO. These children should be left to the people Michael named and if they cannot take care of them I am sure the brothers and sisters of Michael will help take care of them or take them in themselves. Michael Jackson may you rest in peace. Leave his children and family alone.
heather
July 7th, 2009 5:17 PM
Yeah, who cares where the sperm comes from. remember the scene from legally blond, let's remember that daddy is who tucks you in bed at night and keeps a roof over your head. So that would be Michael Jackson, I think he was probably a good father, as best he could be in the crazy position he found himself.
bingo
July 7th, 2009 12:51 PM
Michael paid for those kids and he bought them fair and square...
helmut
July 6th, 2009 7:40 AM
additional. If somebody would take any morphine or any of its derivates and would start to train for a stage act or perform any stage act, he/ she would fall over after one or two dancing steps, would forget the lyrics of the songs and whatever and not perform that what is to be seen in his last videos recorded at staple`s centre!
Maybe all managers now have a serious problem with the Millions of fans Michaels also had because he waqs much better than his made up reputation! he for sure helped under- privileged children and did not misuse any of them. I dont now what these stpries are good for they for sure touch inferior unsconscious fears and aversions. Also germanys newspapers are sometimes full of sick stories about any "child molestors", sometimes just inbelievable ones!!! Indeed many parents cannot feed their children anymore because of steady rising prises an falling incomes .What about this boy, whos mother made several frauds ton gain more social money? He had cancer
helmut
July 6th, 2009 7:05 AM
Now surely everybody comes along claiming also, that Jacksons fathership to the children would not be real, as everyone now just tries to makes his/hers best coup out of Michaels death regarding the legal inheritage the children can claim for.
However: in the only known real interview with Michael ( "living with Michael Jackson)his children had to wear masks but just seen form behind, two of them had blonde hair, maybe coloured.
In this interview 2003 M said to have around one billion dollars. Now- 5 years later he should have left almost nothing over?
US people are not different to anyone else
One news story follows the other: " Several injections traces were found on Michaels body"- a real junkie has hundreds of...
Then_ first Michael was supposed to have consumed painkillers especially synthetic morphines, those were invented in Germany ( IG Farben, on which Rockefeller owned 40 %) to find a medical pain killer which does not cause addiction! But the opposite was the case
Joseph
July 5th, 2009 8:09 PM
What a shame! Why does the black race praise Michael so much when he has proven over and over again distinctly he was ashamed to be black. He conceived in his own mind that becoming more white would give him this edge to become more of a super-star than if he stayed black. And guess what: it worked! Not only changing his appearance to look white, he married Lisa Marie, a white girl (he never dated blacks), and married Debbie Rowe, and now he is raising white kids from someone else. Looks to me he was ashamed to use his black sperm to reproduce black kids. Let's get over all the appraising this very sick man and start praising those who deserve it. I really feel so sorry for these kids and what they have to face all their lives from this very sick and twisted man.
kikiturey
July 4th, 2009 2:03 PM
How dare that doctor comes up to claim he is the biological father. No DNA should be made or any test whatever. Those children know Micheal as their father and him alone.No matter who claims to be whoever, the children should be left with the jacksons.The court should think of the children's happiness first and not some whoever who are claiming whatever.Pliz if the authorities love those children, they should be left where they belong, where they are use to and where they are happy, not some "animal raising mom" who knows nothing but the love for animals. That is why she is even staying in a bizare (strange)area out of town, her town or environment is as shabby, miserable and lonely as her.She is suppose to to leave in the jungle since animals are her companions. What will she teach the children?, that animals are better off than men, that the jungle is safer, what will she tell them?, that she gave them up because of money, she is just a starving mom, love starved and looking for her
kikiturey
July 4th, 2009 1:41 PM
Nobody should disturb those children. They should be left with the paternal grand mom since they are use to her. Their biological mom should get out, all she wants is money. A woman who only loves animals should not be given child custody. If she really loves the children she should leave them with the jacksons. Cuz if she dares and take those children they will hate her all their life for causing instability in their lives.What did micheal even see in a woman like that. So fat, shabby looking and so unkempt.Please just leave them for the jacksons! rubbish.
tina
July 3rd, 2009 4:58 PM
OMG! I feel for these kids, it seems they spent their time and know mainly Michael and his family. Its bad enought the have to go through the loss of the only father they knew. I hope they are left with Michaels family at least those were the people they knew the best.They need something to stay somewhat the same for them now that their father is no longer with them.
taylor
July 3rd, 2009 4:45 PM
check this out then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCfSpZUpRRs&feature=channel_page
sala
July 3rd, 2009 1:25 AM
I do not like Michael Jackson and his family. They throw thier weight around. Debbie Rowe is a poor woman. Debbie was unable to bear any more children after the painful birth of her daughter. They think money can solve everything. They do not know a mother's heart.
kylie
July 2nd, 2009 3:40 PM
Leave these poor kids alone for goodness sake.
Anybody can be a sperm doner but it takes a real man to love the kids and meet their needs which is what michael has done.
It's pretty obvious Michael isn't the biological father of Prince or Paris but he is the one who has brought them up and he is the one who has loved them and been there for them. Thats what a dad is meant to do and that is what he has done. I've seen a few pictures of Blanket and he does look very much like Michael when he was young, in his Jackson 5 days, he's a very cute boy and is more than likely MJ's biological son. He was brought up by Michael, loved by michael and cared for by michael, just like Prince and Paris. The three may not be blood related but their bonds will be as strong of that of biological siblings or probably stronger.
Katherine deserves the custody of these children, she is their grandmother and didn't give up her rights. I hope the courts decide whats best for these children.
Kirby Sommers
July 2nd, 2009 9:28 AM
When I first heard the rumor that Michael Jackson’s two eldest children were the result of sperm donor, Arnold Klein, I wasn’t at all surprised. Years ago, when billionaire Ira Riklis was my boyfriend he confided in me: “My father wants my sperm." Ira's father is Meshulam Riklis -- described both as the junk bond king of the 1980s and a low life mobster. The elder Rikis was married to Pia Zadora at the time and Ira told me Pia was pressuring his father for a baby. In the world of the super wealthy, people order children the way you and I order pizza. – Kirby Sommers
Kim
July 2nd, 2009 7:32 AM
Everyone here is absolutely correct. DNA doesn't make you a father, however, his selfish actions has now caused these children's futures to be left up in the air because he CHOSE not to legally adopt them for selfish reasons - to protect his lies. Now he's gone and there's a real chance that their biological parents could take them from the only life they've ever known.
hgv
July 1st, 2009 10:16 PM
yea jackson adopts and arranges kids births-- fantastic --a parent indeed who took care of those children and family bonds established ==there is not much known to the public about the situation of family , friends and associates in this issue but it must be somewhat a personal issue and I guess so be it-- yea it does not matter in terms of age biological etc- if a familiar family member is there to take care and says and does this---we hear all these stories about people who promoted their kids to stardom --then stardon ,peers and environment were influencial thus they changed--what came about sucessful and a cue for more and more freedom to explore the world ===so many news stories it's just incredible
whatever
July 1st, 2009 5:38 PM
Michael Jackson used to be married to Debbie Rowe, but neither were the biological parents of the singer's first two children, Michael Jr., 12, and Paris, 11.
this sentence makes no sense, how can they say neither michael or debbie were the biological parents if Debbie is the biological mother? Crappy editing, reporting by US weekly, but why am I surprised
chelsbx
July 1st, 2009 5:13 PM
Preston 21 90 ..you gave a web addy for the 911 call for Michael jackson but not going to it ...whats up with that>>>>
ltr08
July 1st, 2009 5:00 PM
No doubt in my mind that "Blanket" looks like Michael...the chin is EXACTLY the same...compare it with early pics of Michael....
barbs
July 1st, 2009 3:14 PM
4 crying out load the past is the past thats y its called the past y the hell r the reporters bringing it all back up y cant thay just leave mj r.i.p and let his children and family griev its not 2 much 2 ask is it or havent the reporters got a heart how would thay feel if it was about 1 of there family love u allways mj xx
Sara
July 1st, 2009 10:17 AM
I personally don't want to read any more articles on his kids. Pls let them be.
tee
July 1st, 2009 6:53 AM
Why all dis, why didnt they come up with all dis before he died,beleive me they are both going to lose.
yoyo
July 1st, 2009 3:49 AM
The oldest boy looks like his biological father very much.
July 9th, 2009 1:08 AM
I believe since Michael Jackson never legally adopted his children, though he assumed the role as a guardian/father to them, it is morally imperative that these children know who their real parents are because it has been psychologically damaging to these children with such a disjointed upbringing regardless of how "kind" Michael Jackson may have been to them. There are way too many "selfish egos" involved in this whole scenario that are interfering with the harsh reality of fractured children. These are "children" not "toys" and they need to feel secure emotionally. It's not even a matter of who gets custody at this point, but rather who will be the person or persons to give them emotional stability and security in knowing who they are as human beings and their lineage. There may be medical issues in the future that biological information will prove vital to these childrens' physical and emotional well being. If Dr. Arnold Klein is the parent (no matter if he has a gay partner), thi
July 7th, 2009 8:31 PM
If he is or is not their biological father he is their father in all the ways that matter. My goodness even in his tragic death the media still hounds him and can not leave him alone. Is it any wonder he felt the way he did about himself. I think in many ways the media killed this beautiful soul who will be forever missed. And if these children are removed from the family they have always known the Jackson family there is no justice in this world. God Bless you Michael and your children and family. I hope you find peace where you are now and see how much you are loved!!!!
July 7th, 2009 7:38 PM
Michael Jackson is a sick person. He brought these poor children into this world and they're not even his. You all can say it doesn't matter, but don't kid yourselves cause it does.
July 7th, 2009 6:05 PM
Michael Jackson raised these children and he is their father no matter how many DNA tests someone takes. He has taken care of them financially, emotionally, and loved these children which means he is the Dad and only parent the children have ever known. People should leave Michael Jackson's children and family alone. (Example: Say a person adopts a child and then this person passes away should the birth parents have the right to get them back. NO. These children should be left to the people Michael named and if they cannot take care of them I am sure the brothers and sisters of Michael will help take care of them or take them in themselves. Michael Jackson may you rest in peace. Leave his children and family alone.
July 7th, 2009 5:17 PM
Yeah, who cares where the sperm comes from. remember the scene from legally blond, let's remember that daddy is who tucks you in bed at night and keeps a roof over your head. So that would be Michael Jackson, I think he was probably a good father, as best he could be in the crazy position he found himself.
July 7th, 2009 12:51 PM
Michael paid for those kids and he bought them fair and square...
July 6th, 2009 7:40 AM
additional. If somebody would take any morphine or any of its derivates and would start to train for a stage act or perform any stage act, he/ she would fall over after one or two dancing steps, would forget the lyrics of the songs and whatever and not perform that what is to be seen in his last videos recorded at staple`s centre!
Maybe all managers now have a serious problem with the Millions of fans Michaels also had because he waqs much better than his made up reputation! he for sure helped under- privileged children and did not misuse any of them. I dont now what these stpries are good for they for sure touch inferior unsconscious fears and aversions. Also germanys newspapers are sometimes full of sick stories about any "child molestors", sometimes just inbelievable ones!!! Indeed many parents cannot feed their children anymore because of steady rising prises an falling incomes .What about this boy, whos mother made several frauds ton gain more social money? He had cancer
July 6th, 2009 7:05 AM
Now surely everybody comes along claiming also, that Jacksons fathership to the children would not be real, as everyone now just tries to makes his/hers best coup out of Michaels death regarding the legal inheritage the children can claim for.
However: in the only known real interview with Michael ( "living with Michael Jackson)his children had to wear masks but just seen form behind, two of them had blonde hair, maybe coloured.
In this interview 2003 M said to have around one billion dollars. Now- 5 years later he should have left almost nothing over?
US people are not different to anyone else
One news story follows the other: " Several injections traces were found on Michaels body"- a real junkie has hundreds of...
Then_ first Michael was supposed to have consumed painkillers especially synthetic morphines, those were invented in Germany ( IG Farben, on which Rockefeller owned 40 %) to find a medical pain killer which does not cause addiction! But the opposite was the case
July 5th, 2009 8:09 PM
What a shame! Why does the black race praise Michael so much when he has proven over and over again distinctly he was ashamed to be black. He conceived in his own mind that becoming more white would give him this edge to become more of a super-star than if he stayed black. And guess what: it worked! Not only changing his appearance to look white, he married Lisa Marie, a white girl (he never dated blacks), and married Debbie Rowe, and now he is raising white kids from someone else. Looks to me he was ashamed to use his black sperm to reproduce black kids. Let's get over all the appraising this very sick man and start praising those who deserve it. I really feel so sorry for these kids and what they have to face all their lives from this very sick and twisted man.
July 4th, 2009 2:03 PM
How dare that doctor comes up to claim he is the biological father. No DNA should be made or any test whatever. Those children know Micheal as their father and him alone.No matter who claims to be whoever, the children should be left with the jacksons.The court should think of the children's happiness first and not some whoever who are claiming whatever.Pliz if the authorities love those children, they should be left where they belong, where they are use to and where they are happy, not some "animal raising mom" who knows nothing but the love for animals. That is why she is even staying in a bizare (strange)area out of town, her town or environment is as shabby, miserable and lonely as her.She is suppose to to leave in the jungle since animals are her companions. What will she teach the children?, that animals are better off than men, that the jungle is safer, what will she tell them?, that she gave them up because of money, she is just a starving mom, love starved and looking for her
July 4th, 2009 1:41 PM
Nobody should disturb those children. They should be left with the paternal grand mom since they are use to her. Their biological mom should get out, all she wants is money. A woman who only loves animals should not be given child custody. If she really loves the children she should leave them with the jacksons. Cuz if she dares and take those children they will hate her all their life for causing instability in their lives.What did micheal even see in a woman like that. So fat, shabby looking and so unkempt.Please just leave them for the jacksons! rubbish.
July 3rd, 2009 4:58 PM
OMG! I feel for these kids, it seems they spent their time and know mainly Michael and his family. Its bad enought the have to go through the loss of the only father they knew. I hope they are left with Michaels family at least those were the people they knew the best.They need something to stay somewhat the same for them now that their father is no longer with them.
July 3rd, 2009 4:45 PM
check this out then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCfSpZUpRRs&feature=channel_page
July 3rd, 2009 1:25 AM
I do not like Michael Jackson and his family. They throw thier weight around. Debbie Rowe is a poor woman. Debbie was unable to bear any more children after the painful birth of her daughter. They think money can solve everything. They do not know a mother's heart.
July 2nd, 2009 3:40 PM
Leave these poor kids alone for goodness sake.
Anybody can be a sperm doner but it takes a real man to love the kids and meet their needs which is what michael has done.
It's pretty obvious Michael isn't the biological father of Prince or Paris but he is the one who has brought them up and he is the one who has loved them and been there for them. Thats what a dad is meant to do and that is what he has done. I've seen a few pictures of Blanket and he does look very much like Michael when he was young, in his Jackson 5 days, he's a very cute boy and is more than likely MJ's biological son. He was brought up by Michael, loved by michael and cared for by michael, just like Prince and Paris. The three may not be blood related but their bonds will be as strong of that of biological siblings or probably stronger.
Katherine deserves the custody of these children, she is their grandmother and didn't give up her rights. I hope the courts decide whats best for these children.
July 2nd, 2009 9:28 AM
When I first heard the rumor that Michael Jackson’s two eldest children were the result of sperm donor, Arnold Klein, I wasn’t at all surprised. Years ago, when billionaire Ira Riklis was my boyfriend he confided in me: “My father wants my sperm." Ira's father is Meshulam Riklis -- described both as the junk bond king of the 1980s and a low life mobster. The elder Rikis was married to Pia Zadora at the time and Ira told me Pia was pressuring his father for a baby. In the world of the super wealthy, people order children the way you and I order pizza. – Kirby Sommers
July 2nd, 2009 7:32 AM
Everyone here is absolutely correct. DNA doesn't make you a father, however, his selfish actions has now caused these children's futures to be left up in the air because he CHOSE not to legally adopt them for selfish reasons - to protect his lies. Now he's gone and there's a real chance that their biological parents could take them from the only life they've ever known.
July 1st, 2009 10:16 PM
yea jackson adopts and arranges kids births-- fantastic --a parent indeed who took care of those children and family bonds established ==there is not much known to the public about the situation of family , friends and associates in this issue but it must be somewhat a personal issue and I guess so be it-- yea it does not matter in terms of age biological etc- if a familiar family member is there to take care and says and does this---we hear all these stories about people who promoted their kids to stardom --then stardon ,peers and environment were influencial thus they changed--what came about sucessful and a cue for more and more freedom to explore the world ===so many news stories it's just incredible
July 1st, 2009 5:38 PM
Michael Jackson used to be married to Debbie Rowe, but neither were the biological parents of the singer's first two children, Michael Jr., 12, and Paris, 11.
this sentence makes no sense, how can they say neither michael or debbie were the biological parents if Debbie is the biological mother? Crappy editing, reporting by US weekly, but why am I surprised
July 1st, 2009 5:13 PM
Preston 21 90 ..you gave a web addy for the 911 call for Michael jackson but not going to it ...whats up with that>>>>
July 1st, 2009 5:00 PM
No doubt in my mind that "Blanket" looks like Michael...the chin is EXACTLY the same...compare it with early pics of Michael....
July 1st, 2009 3:14 PM
4 crying out load the past is the past thats y its called the past y the hell r the reporters bringing it all back up y cant thay just leave mj r.i.p and let his children and family griev its not 2 much 2 ask is it or havent the reporters got a heart how would thay feel if it was about 1 of there family love u allways mj xx
July 1st, 2009 10:17 AM
I personally don't want to read any more articles on his kids. Pls let them be.
July 1st, 2009 6:53 AM
Why all dis, why didnt they come up with all dis before he died,beleive me they are both going to lose.
July 1st, 2009 3:49 AM
The oldest boy looks like his biological father very much.