It's official: Carrie Prejean has lied about topless photos almost as often as George W. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction.
Earlier this week, in response to a leaked picture of her topless, the controversial beauty queen claimed there were "no other photos" of herself in such a pose.
But TheDirty.com has published a new shot of Prejean, once again wearing nothing but a sexy pair of pink undies. We aren't math majors, but we're pretty sure this makes TWO topless Carrie Prejean pics:
Are more racy photos of Carrie Prejean on the way? And will she continue to mislead the public about their existence? Stay tuned!
Forget her religion, forget her Bible references and forget her stance on gay marriage. People of California, we ask:
Do you want someone representing you that has not only violated the nudity clause in her pageant's contract, but has proceeded to lie about how many times she did so?
Meanwhile, Tami Farrell appeared on Access Hollywood last night. The Miss California runner-up said she's ready to take on the crown if officials strip it from Prejean.
"I would be honored to represent the state of California if they need me for my responsibilities as first runner-up," Tami said. "I wouldn't mind stepping into the spotlight."
As for Carrie, Farrell tried to remain diplomatic: "There is a lot of controversy right now. I commend her actually for taking a stance in something she believes in."
Share
18 Comments
May 7th, 2009 10:52 AM
Have you all lost it completely? This is the same exact photoshoot.
Since when did you hear about a photoshoot where only a single photo was taken?
There's obviously a sick agenda behind this.
May 7th, 2009 11:14 AM
Who cares if it was only one photoshoot?! She still broke the rules AND lied about it. I think thsi Tami Farrel seems much more deserving and honest. Carrie Prejean is a liar and totally fake.
May 7th, 2009 11:17 AM
Give me a break, actually give the poor girl a break. Notice the same panties so this is the same modeling job that she already admitted to doing. Get over it, she has a right to be opposed to gay marriage. I admire her courage in being honest rather than politically correct.... obviously the people out to get her are not that moral...
May 7th, 2009 11:20 AM
Why are so many people attacking this girl? She has done nothing but stand up for herself....I did not read anywhere that she said that!! She said, "I am a Christian, and I am a model," Prejean said. "Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos."
See the "s" in the word "pictures"?!? That means plural, more than one photo....As in the photos taken of her in the swimsuit competition, and all other contestants of the contest...all partially nude, all sanctioned by the pageant. This attack on her is only because of her stance on the gay marriage issue and is sickening. It has gon way too far and has severely hurt your cause. It is distancing your views from the majority. It is a sick atttempt to manipulate others in to staying hush, in fear of being smeared and attacked.....the general public does not just see through this shit, but are angered by it....take that poll you asses.
May 7th, 2009 1:02 PM
This has nothing to do with her views on gay marriage!! She broke the rules and she should be out. If she was for gay marriage everyone would just think she should be out.
May 7th, 2009 1:08 PM
Well, she did use religion as her backing for political views. And there is nothing wrong with that - she is perfectly entitled to that. However, when she used religious morals as her backing, that opened up her religious life to the public eye.
Yes, they were specifically looking for things that would damage the reputation of her religious life. Thus deeming her "un-Christian" and unfit to use religion as her reason for being opposed to gay marriage.
However, nobody would have gone looking for those photos had her comments not offended so many people. Are they right to do that to her? Is she right to pose nude for whatever reason? That's all relative and up to the person reading the post.
What is certain is this: she posed semi-nude and there is a spool of photos from the shoot to prove it. That is against the rules.
May 7th, 2009 1:20 PM
Ummmm anyone remember Tara? Miss USA 2006? Yeah. I'm pretty sure she tested positive for coke, got wasted, and made out with Miss Teen USA at a bar and got to keep the crown...
This poor girl voices a personal opinion and everyone wants her out.
Moral of the world of entertainment: Drugs are ok, just don't make fun of homos.
If you want moral character you should be looking at the Miss America pageant. Miss USA is a modeling competition.
May 7th, 2009 1:48 PM
It seems liberalism is poisoning the youth.
It doesn't take much brains to analyze this photo... but people are fed this and essentially told "don't use your head, we will think FOR you, and tell you what to think".
It's a complete dumbing down, and is a disgrace.
How anyone isn't embarrassed to publish this nonsense is proof in itself.
May 7th, 2009 2:14 PM
She did not "use" her religion or Christianity in general...she also did not pose nude for pics. She is not nude in these pictures..you say more of her the night of the Miss USA broadcast, internationally!! Most of thos "swimsuits showed more cleavage than you can see of her armpit/boob-age in these photos. These pictures are not immoral, nor has she behaved immorally, in a Christian or non-Christian way. I, also, do not see how these pictures could be considered partially nude, compared to the pics Miss Cali has posted of her in a string bikini!! These aren't even bikini panties, they are boy shorts!
You leftist hypocrites need to keep digging, as this will not suffice her losing her crown or even a shred of dignity! You should be ashamed for taking your hate and narrowminded asses to such an extreme level of a smear campaign!!
May 7th, 2009 3:02 PM
Interesting. I never said the photos were immoral. I never said she was not a Christian. I said she was going to painted as such because of these photos.
What I did say was that -any which way you look at it- she violated the rules of the pageant. I'm not on the pageant board so it's not my decision and therfore; my opinion of what should happen to Carrie is irrelevant.
I personally don't see this as a religion/morals issue but others will paint it as such simply because Carrie is stating her religion/morals as the reason she opposes gay marrige.
I do see this as a rules issue. The pageant committee has to look at the rules and see if she violated them.