Is the cover shot of an upcoming Blender Magazine truly of Britney Spears nude? And - we never thought we'd ask this - but would people even care anymore if it were?
As previously reported, the publication was considering a body double for the photo shoot considering how "out of shape" Britney is. That's one way of putting it.
Downright homely would be another.
Take a look at the picture and let us know if this is a real image of Britney Spears naked, or if someone has put his/her photoshopping skills to serious use...
In another recent Blender issue: a scantily-clad picture of Heidi Montag may not have required any touch ups. But it did induce a bout of vomiting from those sick of seeing her and evil boyfriend Spencer Pratt in the news.
Share
5 Comments
January 28th, 2008 2:37 PM
It actually says 'this cover image is a compsite photo, Britney did not pose for the picture, that sadly is not her body'
January 28th, 2008 6:38 PM
I was gonna say, it totally looks 'shopped. XD
January 28th, 2008 6:50 PM
Yeah, maybe the people who write this stuff should actually look at the cover where the disclaimer is.
January 28th, 2008 10:52 PM
im not even sure if thats her real face!
February 14th, 2008 1:34 AM
Oh you can tell so tell it's shopped. That body is not hers, it's so obvious the skin tones are very slightly diff her face is too white whilst the body is tanned. And besides that her body right now is all pale, if they wanted it believabe they should have lightened it more.