Mother of Casey Aldridge Confirms: Jamie Lynn Spears is Pregnant! Comments (Page 6)
139 Comments
Craig
December 19th, 2007 11:11 AM
Renee, the schools teach PROTECTION, not sex. But not anymore, thanks to Bush! What do you expect?
As far as those folks such as 'michelleeee'(learn to spell young) stating that they had kids at 16 and everything is hunky dory, you aren't on TV and have milliions of little girls looking up to you, either! THAT is a HUGE difference. This is one of the worst things that could happen for young girls, to have a child star of a program becoming pregnant. It's almost insane. Nick is going to get a huge backlash and will be pulling the program. Her career is over, at least for several years.
Karen
December 19th, 2007 11:06 AM
The only thing is that this ISN'T against the law. They are both old enough to consent to sex. And there IS a problem with this. She's SIXTEEN. Yes, young girls have kids on a daily basis, and yes Jamie is stepping up and taking responsibility for her mistakes, But there is no reason that babies having babies should become common place.
I don't believe this has anything to do with Bush's abstinance-only policies, if Lynne had a problem with what her kids were being taught, its her responsibility to tell her differently, and i guarentee with the level that her daughter is in w/ school, she's probably got a tutor and is being home schooled... kids are going to do what they want to do no matter what. You think a 16 year old isn't aware of condoms and birth control? You're highly dillusional if you believe that. The schools shouldn't be teaching opinions on sex (abstinance vs safe sex...) at all it should be the parents responsibility.
Parents have turned to relying more on the sc
Forte Knott
December 19th, 2007 11:06 AM
Much too young to be pregnant. Mama Spears writing a parenting book: I think not. In order to write a parenting book, you should have done an outstanding job raising your own children. NOT. I am a single mother, not much money, and I have 2 daughters. One the age of Britney and the other the age of Jamie Lynn. Even though we don't have nearly as much money as these 2 sisters I have prided myself on being an exceptional parent. My oldest was Valedictorian at her high school and excelled musically as well as academically, while my youngest is excelling in academics in advanced college level classes, sports, musically, and artistically. That tells me that MONEY has its place but it's not the answer or the guarantee to raising happy, balanced, well-adjusted, and successful children. We have to do our very best, be there no matter what, and PRAY, PRAY, PRAY, that everything works out. My prayers are with their mother, being a mother myself. I thank God for my daughters and the f
Dave
December 19th, 2007 11:01 AM
Katrina you are wrong, you need to open up the law books. Your comments shows that you know nothing about the law. The AGE OF CONSENT is 16 in a few states but not in California where the age is 18. It doesn't matter what the scenario is if you over 18 and have sex with ayone under 18 that is Statutory rape. It doesn't matter if they are head over heals in love. Most teenagers don't know what love is that is why it doesn't make a difference. Nothing will happen to them though. I am sure though that you people have heard of CELEBRITY LAW. This is where you can commit a crime and use your monies to get you off. Celebrities have there own laws that they can break and get away with. No charges will be brought up because Jamie is part of the Celebrity Law. It just goes to show that the Spears sisters are nothing but skanks that people all adore. Britney is a skank just like Jamie is. Otherwise she would wait until she was old enough to have sex. As long as you people keep putting skanks lik
Renee Hale
December 19th, 2007 10:56 AM
CONTINUED: sex act. Her life will never be the same, and let us all hope and pray with all our hearts that Jamie Lynn will be a much, much better mother than Britney. Britney is a HORRIBLE mother, and she is definitely not a ROLE MODEL for my daughter. If there is to be role model for young girls, then we need to look to someone like BEYONCE KNOWLES, and not these irresponsible girls like Jamie Lynn and Britney, who have no self control let alone common sense about life or anything else. Let's pray that Mylie Cyrus won't allow herself to get into that predicament. One final word: Girls enjoy your youth; you have the rest of your lives to be adults. Your youth is only for a short while, up to the age of 18; after that, you are an adult forever. Let's learn from Jamie Lynn's MISTAKE and think before acting. IT IS NOT AN IN-THING TO BE PREGNANT AT 16!!! It is an irresponsible thing.
Vanessa
December 19th, 2007 10:54 AM
At least he's hot! Why anyone would want to keep a baby at 16 is beyond me... and in November, she told the AP that she didn't have a "steady boyfriend", mmm?? Another statistic, I guess, since the US is already the top industrialized country in teen pregnancies! Embrace the decadence! :)
Renee Hale
December 19th, 2007 10:51 AM
She's too young to be pregnant. I have a 14-year-old daughter, and trust me, I would not want her to be pregnant at 16 years of age. Money or no money, there is still a lot of life to live and learn at 16. Her life will not be her own after the delivery of her baby because that baby will HAVE to take precedence over any and all things that she has going on her life. The baby HAS to be first. So, that means she MUST learn to be a responsible, nurturing, caring, loving, and protective parent. She went from a child to a woman in ONE
christie
December 19th, 2007 10:50 AM
It doesn't seem to me that anyone is having any trouble learning about sex, just because its not taught in schools. Hence, the trouble of Jamie Lynn.
I don't need a school to teach my kids about things that I should be teaching them, its called parenting! Furthermore, what needs to be taught is morality, sin and accountability. No one fears God anymore. Everyone is live and let live, and this is the result.
Tina
December 19th, 2007 10:39 AM
I LOVE HER ! shes so pretty! let her live!
michelleeee
December 19th, 2007 10:38 AM
Leave her alone, she is having a kid, big whoop if she is younge. . i had my child younge, get over. Christys right, you guys have like highschool drama. Grow up. I wish her luck as well.
hkjgk
December 19th, 2007 10:37 AM
that whole family is starting to make me sick. Who honestly lets a 16 year old have a child, and she's already 3 months into it! I don't care how much money she has, that's unacceptable. She's only 3 years older than my sister. Personally I think they should send that guy to jail or something to prove the point that this type of thing is against the law.
Syn
December 19th, 2007 10:36 AM
This year the USA has seen a rise in teenage pregnancies. Bush's "abstinence-only" is leading the country's next generation into young parenthood- how can anyone learn about sex if it's not taught. Mr. Stork retired long ago! As for Jamie, mistakes are made- she even said that she got herself into this position- I hope they work things out and raise this child well. I also hope Jamie, being such a role model to young kids, speaks out for PRO-SEX-EDUCATION. She has the power to influence kids what NOT to do.
As for Mrs.Lynne Spears- the last thing she should write is a parenting guide. She should have, at the very least, informed and given both Britney and Jamie of birth control!
christy
December 19th, 2007 10:36 AM
people you need to leave her alone and stfu. i have a child at 16, stuff happens, were human, just let her live, if she wants to haev it, let her, it has nothing to do with you, your like kids in high school, i wish her luck.
joe
December 19th, 2007 10:02 AM
one 16 year old trailer trash + Mississippi redneck=
ONE F....D UP KID!!!!!!
Katrina
December 19th, 2007 9:32 AM
Hey! I am happy for the couple. But to all you stupid people out there she is sixten. SIXTEEN IS AGE OF CONSENT!!!!! which means he can not be charged a sexual preditror and i doubt he raped her. If the parents wish to press charges he will not be listed as a preditor and doubt it will go through but they could list it as UNLAWFUL VOULUNTARY SEXUAL RELATIONS. I know this because I have a friend that is the same boat as Casey Aldridge and Jamie Lynn Spears. I may be only 18 years old but i know my stuff when it comes to it. My really good friend is a cop and he teaches me all the laws that i need to know or what i want to know. HE even says that Casey and Jamie are lucky to have each other and that Casey is NOT a sexual preditor. Luv ya!!
Teresa
December 19th, 2007 9:26 AM
If they started having sex before she turned 16, yes, it could bring a statutory charge. But I doubt that anyone will bring charges because the age difference is within 3 years. Most times you have to be over 16 to consent to sex with someone over 21. If you are younger than 16 you cannot consent to sex with someone over 21.
Still, you'd think with her money and access to healthcare that she would have thought about birth control. Or he would have.
But, I suppose that this is really where Bush's "absintence only" sex-ed program gets us -kids who don't get all the information regarding protection wind up pregnant before they are ready.
Trey Williams
December 19th, 2007 9:20 AM
RAPE!!!
joe
December 19th, 2007 9:12 AM
Hey Jen, would it be OK if your 10 year old got pregnant as long as she loves the guy?
Adam
December 19th, 2007 9:05 AM
How many people are married or have parents that are 3 years or more difference in age? Lets be real.
LINDA
December 19th, 2007 9:04 AM
the rape thing is stupid, but my girl loves her and now will find out she is pregnant. Good role model for our children. Don't tell me she hasn't heard of birth control? I thought she was smarter than that. But she ain't any better than her big sister.
Mike
December 19th, 2007 8:57 AM
Christina, it's called statutory rape.
Look it up...
christina
December 19th, 2007 8:47 AM
That is ridiculous!! He is 19, not 30. Wow, people are really crazy anymore. They are both kids and they made a bad choice. He didn't rape her!! WOW!!!
mindy
December 19th, 2007 8:47 AM
She's 16. She hasn't had enough life experience to know what "love" is. She's leading a jaded life if she thinks she's in love with this guy... she's in LUST with him. Thats all it boils down to. Lets face it, Its not aout the choices that Jamie made... its about the consequences this child is going to face. Especially to have every little mistake his or her mommy made being thrown into the public eye. Its going to be like 10 times worse for this kid than if it were just a regular teen.
And, if he were listed on the national registry, he'd be listed as a sexual offender, not a predator. Theres a difference. He's not going to be listed as that though, that Karen chick is right... she's 16, she's able to consent to have sex.
Jen
December 19th, 2007 8:35 AM
It doesn't come as a shock to me... look at the role model she has had.. Miss Britney!
To those who seem to think she's thrown her life away: I myself was a teen mom.. pregnant at 16 infact. It wasn't my parent's fault for not raising me right, it was my own stupidity for not protecting myself and thinking it wouldn't happen to me. So leave Lynne out of this.. she's got enough on her plate! My daughter is now 10 and she is a perfectly normal, well-adjusted kid.. and I didn't have the millions of dollars that Jamie has to raise the kid. Jamie has to do what's right for her and although you can state your opinion all you want, ultimately it is what she wants, not what the public wants her to do.
And the guy talking rape, you're an idiot! Not every case of "older guy gets younger girl pregnant" is a rape case! Some people actually have sex because they LOVE eachother!!
susan
December 19th, 2007 8:21 AM
no one is really shocked about this news. She is just like her sister. Both sisters should not be role model for anyone-Not kids and especially not moms, and that goes for mama Spears.
December 19th, 2007 11:11 AM
Renee, the schools teach PROTECTION, not sex. But not anymore, thanks to Bush! What do you expect?
As far as those folks such as 'michelleeee'(learn to spell young) stating that they had kids at 16 and everything is hunky dory, you aren't on TV and have milliions of little girls looking up to you, either! THAT is a HUGE difference. This is one of the worst things that could happen for young girls, to have a child star of a program becoming pregnant. It's almost insane. Nick is going to get a huge backlash and will be pulling the program. Her career is over, at least for several years.
December 19th, 2007 11:06 AM
The only thing is that this ISN'T against the law. They are both old enough to consent to sex. And there IS a problem with this. She's SIXTEEN. Yes, young girls have kids on a daily basis, and yes Jamie is stepping up and taking responsibility for her mistakes, But there is no reason that babies having babies should become common place.
I don't believe this has anything to do with Bush's abstinance-only policies, if Lynne had a problem with what her kids were being taught, its her responsibility to tell her differently, and i guarentee with the level that her daughter is in w/ school, she's probably got a tutor and is being home schooled... kids are going to do what they want to do no matter what. You think a 16 year old isn't aware of condoms and birth control? You're highly dillusional if you believe that. The schools shouldn't be teaching opinions on sex (abstinance vs safe sex...) at all it should be the parents responsibility.
Parents have turned to relying more on the sc
December 19th, 2007 11:06 AM
Much too young to be pregnant. Mama Spears writing a parenting book: I think not. In order to write a parenting book, you should have done an outstanding job raising your own children. NOT. I am a single mother, not much money, and I have 2 daughters. One the age of Britney and the other the age of Jamie Lynn. Even though we don't have nearly as much money as these 2 sisters I have prided myself on being an exceptional parent. My oldest was Valedictorian at her high school and excelled musically as well as academically, while my youngest is excelling in academics in advanced college level classes, sports, musically, and artistically. That tells me that MONEY has its place but it's not the answer or the guarantee to raising happy, balanced, well-adjusted, and successful children. We have to do our very best, be there no matter what, and PRAY, PRAY, PRAY, that everything works out. My prayers are with their mother, being a mother myself. I thank God for my daughters and the f
December 19th, 2007 11:01 AM
Katrina you are wrong, you need to open up the law books. Your comments shows that you know nothing about the law. The AGE OF CONSENT is 16 in a few states but not in California where the age is 18. It doesn't matter what the scenario is if you over 18 and have sex with ayone under 18 that is Statutory rape. It doesn't matter if they are head over heals in love. Most teenagers don't know what love is that is why it doesn't make a difference. Nothing will happen to them though. I am sure though that you people have heard of CELEBRITY LAW. This is where you can commit a crime and use your monies to get you off. Celebrities have there own laws that they can break and get away with. No charges will be brought up because Jamie is part of the Celebrity Law. It just goes to show that the Spears sisters are nothing but skanks that people all adore. Britney is a skank just like Jamie is. Otherwise she would wait until she was old enough to have sex. As long as you people keep putting skanks lik
December 19th, 2007 10:56 AM
CONTINUED: sex act. Her life will never be the same, and let us all hope and pray with all our hearts that Jamie Lynn will be a much, much better mother than Britney. Britney is a HORRIBLE mother, and she is definitely not a ROLE MODEL for my daughter. If there is to be role model for young girls, then we need to look to someone like BEYONCE KNOWLES, and not these irresponsible girls like Jamie Lynn and Britney, who have no self control let alone common sense about life or anything else. Let's pray that Mylie Cyrus won't allow herself to get into that predicament. One final word: Girls enjoy your youth; you have the rest of your lives to be adults. Your youth is only for a short while, up to the age of 18; after that, you are an adult forever. Let's learn from Jamie Lynn's MISTAKE and think before acting. IT IS NOT AN IN-THING TO BE PREGNANT AT 16!!! It is an irresponsible thing.
December 19th, 2007 10:54 AM
At least he's hot! Why anyone would want to keep a baby at 16 is beyond me... and in November, she told the AP that she didn't have a "steady boyfriend", mmm?? Another statistic, I guess, since the US is already the top industrialized country in teen pregnancies! Embrace the decadence! :)
December 19th, 2007 10:51 AM
She's too young to be pregnant. I have a 14-year-old daughter, and trust me, I would not want her to be pregnant at 16 years of age. Money or no money, there is still a lot of life to live and learn at 16. Her life will not be her own after the delivery of her baby because that baby will HAVE to take precedence over any and all things that she has going on her life. The baby HAS to be first. So, that means she MUST learn to be a responsible, nurturing, caring, loving, and protective parent. She went from a child to a woman in ONE
December 19th, 2007 10:50 AM
It doesn't seem to me that anyone is having any trouble learning about sex, just because its not taught in schools. Hence, the trouble of Jamie Lynn.
I don't need a school to teach my kids about things that I should be teaching them, its called parenting! Furthermore, what needs to be taught is morality, sin and accountability. No one fears God anymore. Everyone is live and let live, and this is the result.
December 19th, 2007 10:39 AM
I LOVE HER ! shes so pretty! let her live!
December 19th, 2007 10:38 AM
Leave her alone, she is having a kid, big whoop if she is younge. . i had my child younge, get over. Christys right, you guys have like highschool drama. Grow up. I wish her luck as well.
December 19th, 2007 10:37 AM
that whole family is starting to make me sick. Who honestly lets a 16 year old have a child, and she's already 3 months into it! I don't care how much money she has, that's unacceptable. She's only 3 years older than my sister. Personally I think they should send that guy to jail or something to prove the point that this type of thing is against the law.
December 19th, 2007 10:36 AM
This year the USA has seen a rise in teenage pregnancies. Bush's "abstinence-only" is leading the country's next generation into young parenthood- how can anyone learn about sex if it's not taught. Mr. Stork retired long ago! As for Jamie, mistakes are made- she even said that she got herself into this position- I hope they work things out and raise this child well. I also hope Jamie, being such a role model to young kids, speaks out for PRO-SEX-EDUCATION. She has the power to influence kids what NOT to do.
As for Mrs.Lynne Spears- the last thing she should write is a parenting guide. She should have, at the very least, informed and given both Britney and Jamie of birth control!
December 19th, 2007 10:36 AM
people you need to leave her alone and stfu. i have a child at 16, stuff happens, were human, just let her live, if she wants to haev it, let her, it has nothing to do with you, your like kids in high school, i wish her luck.
December 19th, 2007 10:02 AM
one 16 year old trailer trash + Mississippi redneck=
ONE F....D UP KID!!!!!!
December 19th, 2007 9:32 AM
Hey! I am happy for the couple. But to all you stupid people out there she is sixten. SIXTEEN IS AGE OF CONSENT!!!!! which means he can not be charged a sexual preditror and i doubt he raped her. If the parents wish to press charges he will not be listed as a preditor and doubt it will go through but they could list it as UNLAWFUL VOULUNTARY SEXUAL RELATIONS. I know this because I have a friend that is the same boat as Casey Aldridge and Jamie Lynn Spears. I may be only 18 years old but i know my stuff when it comes to it. My really good friend is a cop and he teaches me all the laws that i need to know or what i want to know. HE even says that Casey and Jamie are lucky to have each other and that Casey is NOT a sexual preditor. Luv ya!!
December 19th, 2007 9:26 AM
If they started having sex before she turned 16, yes, it could bring a statutory charge. But I doubt that anyone will bring charges because the age difference is within 3 years. Most times you have to be over 16 to consent to sex with someone over 21. If you are younger than 16 you cannot consent to sex with someone over 21.
Still, you'd think with her money and access to healthcare that she would have thought about birth control. Or he would have.
But, I suppose that this is really where Bush's "absintence only" sex-ed program gets us -kids who don't get all the information regarding protection wind up pregnant before they are ready.
December 19th, 2007 9:20 AM
RAPE!!!
December 19th, 2007 9:12 AM
Hey Jen, would it be OK if your 10 year old got pregnant as long as she loves the guy?
December 19th, 2007 9:05 AM
How many people are married or have parents that are 3 years or more difference in age? Lets be real.
December 19th, 2007 9:04 AM
the rape thing is stupid, but my girl loves her and now will find out she is pregnant. Good role model for our children. Don't tell me she hasn't heard of birth control? I thought she was smarter than that. But she ain't any better than her big sister.
December 19th, 2007 8:57 AM
Christina, it's called statutory rape.
Look it up...
December 19th, 2007 8:47 AM
That is ridiculous!! He is 19, not 30. Wow, people are really crazy anymore. They are both kids and they made a bad choice. He didn't rape her!! WOW!!!
December 19th, 2007 8:47 AM
She's 16. She hasn't had enough life experience to know what "love" is. She's leading a jaded life if she thinks she's in love with this guy... she's in LUST with him. Thats all it boils down to. Lets face it, Its not aout the choices that Jamie made... its about the consequences this child is going to face. Especially to have every little mistake his or her mommy made being thrown into the public eye. Its going to be like 10 times worse for this kid than if it were just a regular teen.
And, if he were listed on the national registry, he'd be listed as a sexual offender, not a predator. Theres a difference. He's not going to be listed as that though, that Karen chick is right... she's 16, she's able to consent to have sex.
December 19th, 2007 8:35 AM
It doesn't come as a shock to me... look at the role model she has had.. Miss Britney!
To those who seem to think she's thrown her life away: I myself was a teen mom.. pregnant at 16 infact. It wasn't my parent's fault for not raising me right, it was my own stupidity for not protecting myself and thinking it wouldn't happen to me. So leave Lynne out of this.. she's got enough on her plate! My daughter is now 10 and she is a perfectly normal, well-adjusted kid.. and I didn't have the millions of dollars that Jamie has to raise the kid. Jamie has to do what's right for her and although you can state your opinion all you want, ultimately it is what she wants, not what the public wants her to do.
And the guy talking rape, you're an idiot! Not every case of "older guy gets younger girl pregnant" is a rape case! Some people actually have sex because they LOVE eachother!!
December 19th, 2007 8:21 AM
no one is really shocked about this news. She is just like her sister. Both sisters should not be role model for anyone-Not kids and especially not moms, and that goes for mama Spears.