Tom Brady There For Son's Birth, Absent From Name

by at . Comments

Tom Brady was mostly missing during Bridget Moynahan's pregnancy with their child (born August 22) - a fact that's reflected in the little guy's name!

The actress, 36, decided not to include her ex's surname - which would've name a great middle name, as it sounds semi-normal - when naming her son.

A rep for the actress has released a statement officially announcing the child's name as John Edward Thomas Moynahan. Ouch, Tom! That hurts.

Someone should have told tell this to the New England Patriots, who, during their game against the Carolina Panthers on August 24, congratulated the 30-year-old quarterback as an announcer told the crowd in Charlotte, N.C., that the boy was named Jonathan Brady.

Tom Brady: Underwear Model?

Despite the obvious baby mama drama, Bridget Moynahan insists all is well.

"She is thankful for a healthy baby and is excited about being a mother," said Moynahan's rep in a statement, who adds that the actress "was very pleased that the father, Tom Brady, was able to be there for the birth."

As for him going back to his Brazilian goddess of a girlfriend, Gisele Bundchen, shortly thereafter, Bridget probably wasn't too thrilled. At least Gisele won't be getting even more exposure on Dancing with the Stars or anything. Oh, wait.

Tags: , ,
Avatar

The baby should have had is father last name - not yours. What you have done is, that this jerk can renounce this boy as not his.
I think is was a wrong move. Will you tell him later in years who his father really is.

Avatar

It's even more of a dig at Tom. The babies initials spell JET