First, Leah Remini. Now, Jada Pinkett Smith. The list of people who claim to have seen Suri Cruise has reached a whopping two.
She's one of the sweetest babies I've ever met in my life," Pinkett Smith said, according to hollyscoop.com. "She's an absolute beauty and she's Daddy's little girl."
Come on now. Doesn't anyone else find it interesting how these supposedly close friends of Tom Cruise are saying how great the baby is and blah blah blah, yet for some reason, there are no pictures of them visiting TomKat?
With photographers taking up residence in the bushes, for God's sake, how would freaking Will and Jada Pinkett Smith go unnoticed visiting Cruise's mansion? This is getting awfully weird, indeed.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK.
Is Suri real or a complete sham? Leave a comment on this post by clicking below, and be sure to vote in our poll (top right).
Share
5 Comments
July 27th, 2006 10:23 AM
Found your website through TMZ. Good stories and great start..:)
I believe she's real. Why she would stay hidden all this time is weird though.
July 27th, 2006 10:55 PM
I have always been a big fan of Tom Cruise. If this Suri story has been all a sham, I will be very, very disappointed..........I just can't believe even in Hollywood anyone in the spotlight would ever try something like this, so I have to believe this baby is real and just has not made her grand appearance yet.
July 28th, 2006 3:23 AM
Suri is real and she's almost 8 months old; born last December, daddy unknown. Remember Katie got really big really quickly?! She was '3' months and looked like 8- and don't forget Katie is tall.. tall women usually hide the bump well. And did anyone actually believe the whirlwind romance in the first place?
But these guys are supposed to be actors- you really think they could have done a better job- stoopid heads! Neither of them have ever really struck me as mental giants- which might explain why the bump kept changing size. The real question is... why did they bother in the first place?
We'll see Suri when she's too old to tell the difference- eg ' is this a 12 or a 16 month baby?'
July 29th, 2006 3:53 PM
I CAN'T WAIT TILL EITHER TOM OR KATIE COME CLEAN & TELL THE PUBLIC IT WAS ALL FOR PUBLICITY & THERE NEVER WAS ANY "BABY"!!!
July 29th, 2006 7:13 PM
I'm with Claire - the baby was born long before they said she was. She isn't Tom's. Isn't he sterile? He's claiming this baby - who probably belongs to Katie's ex - why bother Claire asks? Tom wants to show how "manly" he is - ie he can father a child.